Lubov Aksyonova
Antonia Thomas - yes
Sol's examples of IEI females
Lubov Aksyonova
Antonia Thomas - yes
Irina Pudova
Veronica - yes
Suki Waterhouse
plays in recent trash "Pride and Prejudice and Zombies"
Irina Lachina [on left]
Laura Keosayan
Frida Kahlo
Christina Hendricks
socioniko.net has Dmitry Lytov's listOriginally Posted by Subteigh
Um interesting choice of video
I thought my speakers were dead for about 20 seconds. grrr
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
JoJo Fletcher
Essie Davis
Amel Bent
the example of ESTP woman
Nonna Mordyukova - ESTP
Debbie Harry - INTP(?)
Demi Lovato
Clara Morgane
even weirdleftovers's type is doubtful
Last edited by Sol; 07-05-2016 at 10:01 AM.
Klariza Clayton
Watch videos of her with nick jonas. Shes extroverted
I think IEE is more likely
Last edited by maniac; 07-06-2016 at 11:37 AM.
Clara Morgane
Oh look! Another dumb, blonde, bimbo. In Sol-ionics if you are 2/3 you get to be INFp. At least we know who he thinks he conflicts with.
Nadya Suleman
Savannah Brown - S type is more possible
That INFP give you impression of dumbs doesn't contradict to theory, as thinking is not strong part of F types, example of which is your stupid hysterics.
Then. All types are infantile in the region of weak functions. To say that I type by hairs color was especially mindless from your side.
You have nothing resonable against the examples are correct. While that you don't like objective reality that many INFP are such as you see, is outside of this theme.
P.S. I saw similar inadequate reaction on examples from the ones which thought themselves as INFP (ENFJ is more probable for you), while their behavior proved the examples are good.
Find and post "better" examples. It's the only reasonable thing you may do.
I'll add another, seems from same asylum as Mira
Karina
Darya Perel
Thanks.
Wow, she is so rude and annoying... серьезно
Fe valued types lesser refrain from dirty words. Also low culture level of this example.
I find quite a few of your "INFPs" annoying and/or wrong, so I didn't bother to watch her. I am trying to balance pitta at the moment.Apparently it is the season for it.
You have an insatiable lust for people watching. I don't have much faith in your typing skills because you claim they are <30-50%. You might not even notice your own duals if they fell out of the sky and landed on you. You seem to have a thing for typing people INFP online. Especially those you dislike or think behave inappropriately, by your standards. You guard your methods and won't share though.
For LSE:
But don't fret my pet. It looks like you are not as intuitively wired as you think you are but I already told you that before. I would like to see you post more LSEs so I can get a better sense of who you think you are.You are recommended to frequently review your views on various aspects of life, and to put aside any outdated and unworkable traditions and habits. Dry logic of facts should not suppress in you the appreciation of all that is new and unusual. Moderate your conservatism and stubbornness. More often compare yourself to others, cultivate flexibility in your ways of competing.
You tend to rely on your intuition in your assessments of people, not suspecting that you greatly overestimate this ability in yourself and that you are not immune from arriving at erroneous conclusions and prognoses. The consequence of this may be inappropriate or mis-attributed suspicions, and undue harshness in dealing with others, which can put you in an awkward ethical position. Try to have more restraint and tact in such questions.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I have common real match with others, based on experiment with bloggers on socioforum. And my typings work in classic Socionics borders ok in my experience.
While you don't notice your behavior is closer to Fe valued type than to EII. Similar mistake you have with mostly thinking Fe/Ti types as EII in your examples.
Instead of posting wrong versions which most probably you've taken externally, you'd better posted completely own versions. There are a lot of actors and bloggers to type.
I did not type you by video and hence had no sure opinion about your type, so you could to say "I typed you". Also you may mistake about own type, as do many ones.
On your photos was non-emotional face which is not common for Fe types, hence there is basis to doubt your type is IEI indeed. And if you don't see similarity of my IEI examples with you - it's argument to doubt in your type too.
When you'll post normal typing material, then there will be possibility to check your type seriously.
Looking at the trend one can easily notice the majority of them are blonde. And who said I dont like objective reality? Projections much?
Nadya Suleman
Savannah Brown - S type is more possible
That INFP give you impression of dumbs doesn't contradict to theory, as thinking is not strong part of F types, example of which is your stupid hysterics.
Then. All types are infantile in the region of weak functions. To say that I type by hairs color was especially mindless from your side.
You have nothing resonable against the examples are correct. While that you don't like objective reality that many INFP are such as you see, is outside of this theme.
P.S. I saw similar inadequate reaction on examples from the ones which thought themselves as INFP (ENFJ is more probable for you), while their behavior proved the examples are good.
Find and post "better" examples. It's the only reasonable thing you may do.
Edit(Not as invested in this conversation as it might seem)
Last edited by wacey; 07-07-2016 at 03:02 AM.
Your type is IEI and you think own type as IEI, so you understand good what IEI are. Hence it's expected.
Such things were developed for people with slightly different genome, other meal, other climate. And they are not based on normal experimental basis (science) to be sure they work as said. It's possible to get no good effect or to harm yourself.I am trying to balance pitta at the moment
It's about general match between typers. So to trust highly to someones' typing is baseless today.I don't have much faith in your typing skills because you claim they are <30-50%.
Subjectively I'm sure in own typings on the moment of posting ~90%. What is my objective accuracy is unknown.
In my lists you saw different types. INFP is just the most interesting for me among the most common types in medias.You seem to have a thing for typing people INFP online.
I type random people.Especially those you dislike or think behave inappropriately
And as I said befor, to have strong N function is far not enough to type better.It looks like you are not as intuitively wired as you think you are but I already told you that before.
There are 7 men examples in actors list + 1 blogger. To get my understanding of the type - it's enough.I would like to see you post more LSEs so I can get a better sense of who you think you are.
Most are Russians, it's better to input on youtube original Russian notation of names. Sometimes it's useful to make additional search with the addition of "интервью" (interview) to names.
ESFP
same as Lindsay Lohan
Last edited by maniac; 07-07-2016 at 02:10 PM.
Claire Boucher
Marina Lizorkina
A lot of talking is one of signes for exrtaversy. There are other important signes like what is talked. While to be sure in E it needs several signes, including nonverbal behavior.an obvious sign of an extravert is how much she talks
it's Jungian type!
Last edited by Sol; 07-08-2016 at 09:41 AM.
Anna Kalashnikova
IEI are generally feminine in my perception. one of factors to be "sexy"
if Starfall thinks I know about INFP even lesser than John Snow, it's not importantIf you disagree it will just make my day.
It's interesting how others will find your incomprehensible Wisdom "foreign to a lot of people"
Wendy James - some introvert (wacey should to yell "dumb, blonde, bimbo")
Last edited by Sol; 07-08-2016 at 08:48 PM.
This song should be posted in the low IQ music thread jeez ... For those who can't understand Russian it's title is "Let me undress you" and the lyrics go smth like "quickly dress me, quickly undress me, let me undress you, let all of my inches love you ....". Shame on you @Sol for posting crap like this.
Anna Kalashnikova is LSI. Her ex-fiance Prohor Shaliapin is IEI. They are not of identical type.
(he kinds of looks like Kurt Cobain in this pic)
Women of many other types are both feminine and sexy. If they happen to work in the entertainment industry, women of any type, be they LIE, SEI, LSE, or ILE, are encouraged to be sexy - because sex sells and generates money for the industry. Femininity and sex appeal do not equate to being IEI.
@wacey I'm beginning to see what you mean about Sol's typings. There are sooo many videos of Kalashnikova available on the internet, and he picks the one where she acts like a cheap dumb stripper and types her as IEI.
Lesya Yaroslavskaya
Surgery and botulinum may affect nonverbal behavior.
Resume: she's close to what I think IEI are, not sure but it's possible.
If you'll get other examples, it's interesting to see them.
Generally I don't pay attention to what actors/singers say in interviews, especially foreign ones.You just said your duals do not use vulgar language in another thread or something similar.
EII rarely use "dirty words" compared to Fe types, if she used them in common speaking this reduces the possibility. At least, such situation is among common Russian speakers. In her musical subculture and among English speakes the situation may differ.
Natalya Varvina
Anna Beatriz Barros - E, mb ENFJ
Yevgeniya (Devushki Motora)
Irena Ponaroshku
Emily Kinney
Tatiana Maslany
I think SEI
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
