...
...
Last edited by Suomea; 09-27-2008 at 11:19 PM.
Suomea
those traits all seem pretty negative, so i'm going to say no type at all. they sound like neuroses.
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
LSI.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
Se/Ni
...
Last edited by Suomea; 09-27-2008 at 11:19 PM.
Suomea
LSI or SLI
...
Last edited by Suomea; 09-27-2008 at 11:19 PM.
Suomea
I have all of those qualities.
And every new yorker i've ever came in contact with has been extremely ignorant.
...
Last edited by Suomea; 09-27-2008 at 11:18 PM.
Suomea
I think it's interesting how nobody really likes those traits, yet we constantly get bombarded with messages that's how we should be. Every article I read nowadays is basically another variation of 'GROW SOME BALLS AND STOP BEING A WUSS NOBODY LIKES A NICE, NORMAL GUY!' Of course I don't listen to people just because they can write that lol.
It must be an American thing.
Anyways, genuinely submissive/passive people are a breath of fresh air in a society that prides itself on attempting to cover up its wrongdoings by fortifying a false sense of bravado.
Until people stop sexualizing being tough, aggressive... and until the media stops rewarding said behavior and looking down upon people who aren't that way, will it really ever change?
So who wants to move to a sissy/faggy country with me? Haha j/k.
When you act like that, it makes some people think you are just trying to cover up your weaknesses... and it sets you up for people to hurt/take advantage of you, probably just as much as so as too much in the other direction. I'm sure you understand that.I have all of those qualities.
But if somebody tries to behave/be nice they frequently get accused too much of being a wimp/having no balls/letting others walk over them.... being a dickless dweeb that can't get laid etc.Zero manners, zero respect for others, loud, obnxious, cocky, aggressive, etc.
It's like you can't win either way.
well i am not sure i meant it in a PC way.....lol. i disagree with the idea of listing only negative characteristics and attaching a type label to it, since it's not the whole truth. i'd rather look at IM's...seems closer to the truth and more flexible. so, Se, Ti, Te is what i would see in that list.
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
Such description may apply to LSI, SLE, and ESI.