Kim looks S. ESFP, for example
Kim looks S. ESFP, for example
do itOriginally Posted by Bluebird
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@nondescript ISTp final @Megane LII finalwatch that se polr and please recognize things that are eating away at you.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 10-26-2015 at 04:37 AM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
girl on the left looks cute.. ah.. it's Kore
the tallest guy mb ENTP
And with such rude speech (and fantasies) you still claim to be INFJ.
FFS, lighten up on her. She is human and I thought it was kinda funny and unexpected.And with such rude speech (and fantasies) you still claim to be INFJ.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
It was a way of complementing her. That's cultural as in people here say "you're hot so I'd make love to you." Matters of decency are not avoided under any cost. In fact I did clearly displaye to her how embarrassing I found that for myself by sayinggirl on the left looks cute.. ah.. it's Kore
the tallest guy mb ENTP
And with such rude speech (and fantasies) you still claim to be INFJ.you don't need a further explanation I'm sure.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
It was perfectly fine. <3It was a way of complementing her. That's cultural as in people here say "you're hot so I'd make love to you." Matters of decency are not avoided under any cost. In fact I did clearly displaye to her how embarrassing I found that for myself by saying
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
Don't worry. He doesn't see how clueless and rude he is.FFS, lighten up on her. She is human and I thought it was kinda funny and unexpected.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I understand what others feel not bad. I just say truth and don't care much about others like it or not, as this forum is made for infromation change but not for feelings support. While I'm sure you don't understand how stupid is what you write often on the forum, in similar way as you can't understand your own type for several years despite serious contradictions.
She is mistyped and arguments about this are good for her. And for others wich are misleaded by wrong behavior model of type.
Last edited by Sol; 10-22-2015 at 08:17 PM.
I think you and Kill4me are the same type whatever that is. One taking the moral high road and the other taking the highway to hell. Just because you don't like someone or their behavior does not mean they are not your dual.She is mistyped and arguments about this are good for her. And for others wich are misleaded by wrong behavior model of type.
Edit:
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Okay
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
While you're looking at behavior which isn't a good indicator of type because it's ONE sided...and this you fail to understand... other things that influence behavior (you shallow brained shmuck) is one's emotional disposition. That is purely dependant on a person's personal circumstances for example one's emotional state due to stressful situations. Go learn something new.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
mu4 reminds ISTJ
on that photo
Last edited by Sol; 11-04-2015 at 01:18 PM.
@jaein I am excluding EII as a typing for you because I believe that you missed the purpose, heart and soul, of the EII typing that because of the compassionate nature ofEII are ready to listen and support people to give them a breath of hope and comfort. You demonstrate that you like to listen to people's stories but not in a friend's, calling it "getting old" in your post #45 http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...=1#post1109625
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I have yet to see you contribute anything to the forum besides aggressively retyping people and putting people down. Do you have anything else in your range of behaviors, or is that actually all you can do?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Have I just been dismissed? Is that your only reason? I feel like a lot of people would be a little peeved at being asked for advice and then have the advice being thrown back at them as if its useless. Yes it got old having her dismiss my advice that she constantly asked for. Did I stop listening or tell her to bug off? No. I continued to support her while internally rolling my eyes. Thats all.@jaein I am excluding EII as a typing for you because I believe that you missed the purpose, heart and soul, of the EII typing that because of the compassionate nature of
You may not have stopped listening as you valued the relationship but you stopped feeling for her is the multitude of ways. It became one feeling (stale and old).
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Youve never tired of someones complaints? Really?
I have a very high enduring tolerance
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Hey how's the welcoming committee........anyone challenging your type?
Haha everyone has been friendly thus far. However, Maritsa doesnt believe I am eii but Im not sure what else I could be. I typed Infp in mbti but i've heard that you shouldnt try and translate one system to another. Anyways it doenst matter because Im like 95% sure I'm eii
maritsa needs to see your neckline to type you.
Hahaha You know I heard that there's a lot of accuracy in typing by necklines. Youd be surprised.
I assumed everyone was jumping on you. There will never be consensus. Glad you weathered the storm and I'll take your word that you are EII. Does Delta NF fit you? Subtype you feel best with? Lots to consider for yourself, and not so much from others.
Ah. No there was only one.
Delta nf fits me quite perfectly and I believe Im a Ne subtype. Thank you btw.
[QUOTE]Delta nf fits me quite perfectly and I believe Im a Ne subtype.[QUOTE]There you go then.....my girl here is EII Ne. You seem Fi ego from what little I or anyone else can glean.........my take.
Not at all.........good luck finding your ESTJ. I heard O'Reilly is divorced.Thank you btw.
You sir are an SLI, as is everyone else she types.
[QUOTE=hatesyardwork;1109940][QUOTE]Delta nf fits me quite perfectly and I believe Im a Ne subtype.Hahaha I guess I better slide on in there before some other lucky eii gets himThere you go then.....my girl here is EII Ne. You seem Fi ego from what little I or anyone else can glean.........my take.
Not at all.........good luck finding your ESTJ. I heard O'Reilly is divorced.
[QUOTE=jaein;1109946][QUOTE=hatesyardwork;1109940]Bill Oreilly, the man who has brought us........Killing Kennedy Killing Jesus Killing Lincoln Killing Reagan........and coming this November to a store near you, his most controversial book to date................Killing Socionics. Ghost written by MaristaDelta nf fits me quite perfectly and I believe Im a Ne subtype.
Hahaha I guess I better slide on in there before some other lucky eii gets him
no she can't make up her mind about me, i may be istj, or istp, or estj. i think she's pulled by my si.
[QUOTE=hatesyardwork;1109948][QUOTE=jaein;1109946]Everyone needs to read these books.Everyone.
you know if you actually took a serious interest in me you would see I don't type everyone that type.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
and FINAL.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Pa3s LII
fixed, final and concluded
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
Lol
ILI very fixed final and concluded
Megane is LII
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Chips and Underwear is LII, final, indisputable, irrefutable, beyond doubt, incontestable, irrefrangible, unalterable, beyond dispute.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
just messin
@aut0 LSE
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
That's so much like me!! Amazing
Posting Permissions
