Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
He's not. I benefit from his Te, hence benefit relations. I am drawn to the way he explains things because they are clear, simple, concise, efficient, and highly accurate and not on personal subjective evaluation from the function of T...so, it's Te not Ti.
Really? His descriptions may be concise, but in my experience they are ambiguous/incomplete. I usually need to ask for more information (like on this thread). I can't readily see the paths he take to get to conclusions and he doesn't really define things/really elaborate on what he means...

Maybe that's just me? I think some of his ideas are really good, but he just doesn't provide much information about them...

Then again, I don't very greatly understand anyone on this whole forum...