Really? His descriptions may be concise, but in my experience they are ambiguous/incomplete. I usually need to ask for more information (like on this thread). I can't readily see the paths he take to get to conclusions and he doesn't really define things/really elaborate on what he means...
Maybe that's just me? I think some of his ideas are really good, but he just doesn't provide much information about them...
Then again, I don't very greatly understand anyone on this whole forum...