I haven't really read any of the posts in this thread. I only have some sort of view on Agnetha's type, who I can't see as anything but an ISFj or INFj.
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
You havn't answered my fundamental question.
You are clearly wrong till you take the time to do so, progressively speaking.
Even then it will not make you right unless you explain the systematic issues.
You are clearly wrong ISTJ is Delta no different then ESTJ is Delta. Period.
You moron, ISTP can't be Delta cause it extinguishes ESTJ and thus they cant be a part of the same quadra.
These are the dumbest suggestions i have ever heard from you. Actually you don't even know how to make suggestions...you're too dellusional in your own ego efforts or superego efforts for all i know.
the question posed to you once again: Maybe you'd like to tell me the rest of the MBTI Beta strand , or the rest of the MBTI Delta strand...or any strand at all ??. (this is where you'll be wrong)
ENTP:wink:ALPHA
Which is your fundamental question exactly?
And you are an idiot until proven otherwise.Originally Posted by kensi
Now you will shut the fuck up with this idiotic thinking of yours. You don't understand the functions, and you don't understand the types.Originally Posted by kensi
Idiotic thinking. Why don't you start using your brain?Originally Posted by kensi
You are polluding the forum with gibberish. Not a nice thing to do. Why do you want to brainwash other people? Are you born evil?Originally Posted by kensi
the question posed to you once again: Maybe you'd like to tell me the rest of the MBTI Beta strand , or the rest of the MBTI Delta strand...or any strand at all ??. (this is where you'll be wrong)
ALL THE TYPES ARE IDENTICAL ACROSS MBTT AND SOCIONICS. EVERY SINGLE, CORRECTLY TYPED, ISTJ IS AN ISTj (LSI). EVERY SINGLE ISTP IS AN ISTp (SLI). NOW YOU WILL TRY TO UNDERSTAND THIS OR BE FOREVER SILENT ON THE SUBJECT.
So thru this, whether you know it or not,(in your knowing that ISTp is Delta).......... you are claiming that all these MBTI Designations are Delta: ISTP, ESTP, INFJ, ENFJ. This is clearly not the case. You are greatly confusing everybody including and especially yourself.
ENTP:wink:ALPHA
MBTT is the Myers-Briggs Type Theory, which is the theory that tries to explain why the real types are what they are. MBTT and Socioncs describe the exact same groups of people (identified by the four dichotomies), but their theoretical explanations for them are different. The two theories agree on what the real types are in their typical behaviours and attitudes, what they look like, etc., and they agree on how to group them according to temperaments, test results, dichotomies, and so on. But MBTT has confused Jung's functions for the introverted types, which has resulted in the well-known mess that is the major cause of all mistypings on this forum and elsewhere.
If we look at how Jung described the types and compare that with how MBTT and Socionics describe the types, we find that the essence of Introverted Thinking in Jung's sense is also the essence of -- but it is not the essence of Ti in MBTT. Ti in MBTT is essentially much more like Extraverted Thinking in Jung's sense, and in socionic terms Ti (in MBTT) is some sort of mixture of and (with perhaps some traits of ), and it is very important to notice that INTPs in MBTT are always described as having a focus on the external world, on objectivity, objective truth and knowledge, etc., which is clearly in Socionics. The INTJs and the INTjs (LIIs) on the other hand, are recognized as "systems thinkers" in both models, they have a focus on implementing their subjective systems, ideas, etc. instead of seeking the objective truth, and that is the essence of and Introverted thinking in Jung's sense.
We also find, when we compare the theories with reality, that INTjs (LIIs) always exhibit J behaviour and attitudes, that all of them seem to be early birds, that many of them are relativists of some sort, that many of them criticize typical notions like the concept of an objective reality, the concept of truth as correspondence with reality, etc. That is in the nature of , but it is certainly not the nature of being an INTP in MBTT or an ILI in Socionics. And we find that INTps (ILIs) always exhibit P behaviour and attitudes, that all of them seem to be night owls, that they tend to be objectivists and especially empiricists to a much greater extent than INTjs, and they tend to accept (and more important, in contrast to the INTjs, the INTps understand the concept truth correctly as it should be understood, as correspondence with reality).
MBTI is the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, which is nothing but a typing intstrument, and in that respect it is no different from socionic tests, even though MBTI tests tend to be more accurate than most socionic test and can therefore be recommended as one of several means to determine a person's socionic type.