What type could I be?

[DaftPunk]

Thanks for the opinions. I agree with and tend to lean in the direction of LII, but the seemingly irrational(type)/doubtful behavior/thinking seems to contradict the general LII descriptions. Otherwise, I think Alpha values + IJ tend to fit me, but I haven't really found a decent description of the quadras(though they are just the valued functions), and Gamma values tend to be described in an overly stereotypical way, and I could also see IP. Most of this was apparent though, reading your responses.

There's the dichotomy judicious/decisive. Judicious means valued Ne/Si and Decisive means valued Ni/Se according to Gulenko(?) extraversion strengthens decisiveness and introversion judiciousness.

IMO in most LII descriptions they come across as pretty judicous when it comes to action.
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ile-by-Gulenko

Don't mix up LII and MBTI INTJ they're completeley different

[GrimtheThird]

There's the dichotomy judicious/decisive. Judicious means valued Ne/Si and Decisive means valued Ni/Se according to Gulenko(?) extraversion strengthens decisiveness and introversion judiciousness.

IMO in most LII descriptions they come across as pretty judicous when it comes to action.
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ile-by-Gulenko

Don't mix up LII and MBTI INTJ they're completeley different

Thanks, I knew there was a better translation of those Gulenko detailed descriptions but I forgot/overlooked the16types articles. I tread lightly when dealing with Reinen dichotomies, so i've not really applied them in any way. As for MBTI INJT & Socionics LII, you're right, they are pretty different. Socionics does functions better, and Big Five does dichotomies better.

[DaftPunk]

Thanks, I knew there was a better translation of those Gulenko detailed descriptions but I forgot/overlooked the16types articles. I tread lightly when dealing with Reinen dichotomies, so i've not really applied them in any way. As for MBTI INJT & Socionics LII, you're right, they are pretty different. Socionics does functions better, and Big Five does dichotomies better.

You can't compare Big Five with Socionics because big 5 is not meant to be a typing system.

Reinin Dichotomies is normally not very helpfull when you start with socionics because you get lost in it to easily. But's a good thing to determine your type when you're more familiar with Socionics.
But judicious/decisive and merry(Ti/Fe)/serious(Te/Fi) determine your quadra and are easy Reinin Dichotomies because they say nothing more than what functions you value.
I agree with you that the quadra descriptions are very steriotypical but you'll get a better feeling about quadras the longer you hang out here.

IMO the descriptions who are on this board are rather good.

[GrimtheThird]

You can't compare Big Five with Socionics because big 5 is not meant to be a typing system.

Reinin Dichotomies is normally not very helpfull when you start with socionics because you get lost in it to easily. But's a good thing to determine your type when you're more familiar with Socionics.
But judicious/decisive and merry(Ti/Fe)/serious(Te/Fi) determine your quadra and are easy Reinin Dichotomies because they say nothing more than what functions you value.
I agree with you that the quadra descriptions are very steriotypical but you'll get a better feeling about quadras the longer you hang out here.

IMO the descriptions who are on this board are rather good.

Sorry, I should have been more clear. Big Five does them better in comparison to MBTI.