Which PoLR is easiest to spot?

[UDP]

Yeah, from my perspective Ne barely counts as a PoLR. All you have to do is explain the situation to them.

Right, well, doesn't that make sense?
I'm not really sure which ones stand out.


Ne porl is really obvious to me because I've dealt with it so much recently. I get into arguments with ISTjs and ISFjs at times because we're looking at the same thing from different perspectives and it can be problematic if there are no intuitive types to facilitate understanding.

Se polrs do not bother me, to me it is just like the "go ahead", the "green light" for being more protective towards that person.

- - -
The most annoying is ENFj's Si polr, IMO, because they need you to actually get angry and visibly reactive, just to sort of prove that they can be "calmed" down.

I do not have extensive experience with INFp Te polr, but with ISFps, they just sort of have a tendency to ... seem foolish? Childish? I don't know.

[Joy]

Se polrs do not bother me, to me it is just like the "go ahead", the "green light" for being more protective towards that person.

That makes sense.

Ni polrs are kind of annoying in that they need a sort of constant reassurance.

My experience is the opposite... Ne PoLR's are the ones who seem to need reassurance (or at least assurance), but I'm sure it depends on what kind of reassurance you're offering them.

The most annoying is ENFj's Si polr, IMO, because they need you to actually get angry and visibly reactive, just to sort of prove that they can be "calmed" down.

I always assumed that had more to do with Fe and Se than Si?

[Logos]

My experience is the opposite... Ni PoLR's are the ones who seem to need reassurance (or at least assurance), but I'm sure it depends on what kind of reassurance you're offering them.

Isn't that what he said? How is "Ni polrs are kind of annoying in that they need a sort of constant reassurance." different from "Ni PoLR's are the ones who seem to need reassurance..."?

[Joy]

typo

[Logos]

typo

Okay. That makes far more sense now. And you are right, as I do think that both types would need reassurance for something that they may not be prepared for

[Quirk Satellite Div.]

PoLRs will, obviously, most easily annoy me, so I can definitely tell there is a strain between them and me. However, PoLRs are the easiest to spot; the concern (or lack of) for is easily the first thing people see when observing a person.

[UDP]

typo

Darn, I had a typo too. let me fix it...

[implied]

I always assumed that had more to do with Fe and Se than Si?

yeah, i think this can be how a Se-polr person might view a Se-dom. i was thinking along the lines of the ESTp uncovered vs how an INFj might view this.

[UDP]

My experience is the opposite... Ne PoLR's are the ones who seem to need reassurance (or at least assurance), but I'm sure it depends on what kind of reassurance you're offering them.

Just disregard what I said there, I don't remember what I was talking about, but I don't think it was Ni polr. It doesn't seem to make sense.

[Ms. Kensington]

poof

[theMime.]

Goo goo ga ga.

dolphin, you are hilarious.

[liveandletlive]

yay no one said !

IMO, i'd have to say PoLR for being the most obvious.

[liveandletlive]

Read the post directly above, and you'll see that I just said .

shut up.

[xyz]

the claws come out.

[liveandletlive]

ROFL, I wasn't being condescending there. The smilie says all.

http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ght=definition
sorry if i misunderstood seeing as is quite the ambiguous "smilie."

[XoX]

http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ght=definition
sorry if i misunderstood seeing as is quite the ambiguous "smilie."

To summarize that thread for lazies...

Here is liveandletlive's interpretation

im making the executive decision that im using razz only to show disgust. it's face looks like it's about to spew all over my computer screen.

whereas my interpretation is probably closer to what Herzy meant

I guess it is kind of "don't take what I said too seriously".

[Sol]

it's possibly to distinguish directly what functions are strong/weak, valued/nonvalued. but it's doubtful more
also the weakest functions are suggestive/role