are there easy ways to tell if someone is sx-last?
are there easy ways to tell if someone is sx-last?
IEI-Fe 4w3
yeah. interesting. you're sx-last! I know another 9w1 (SEI) who is sx-last and I'm thinking that this SLE I know who is 7w8 is also probably sx-last but I can't tell for sure. I think he does need space, regardless of how things are going. I know he got married later in life (well, if you consider 33 later) and seems to know everyone in our social circle but it's not exactly clear if he has many really close friends. But then I think that not many men do.
IEI-Fe 4w3
but I was just thinking about the "needing space" thing and realized that I need space too! Plenty of it. hmmm. And I really don't think I'm sx-last.
IEI-Fe 4w3
Actually, I can attest to this to a certain extent. Except for me I tend to be socially-oriented. A veritable social butterfly if you will. But I get claustrophobic of intimate space. I struggle to develop close relationships because if people get too close too quickly I start pushing away in a need to protect my intimate space.
BP is also so/sp and he's expressed similar sentiments. We call it Scorched Earth policy. Social Social Social - INTIMATE!!! - Nuke everything.
ILE
7w8 so/sp
Very busy with work. Only kind of around.
that is for sure true about me.
Hmmm. well, the SEI 9 I know holds everyone at arm's length, just as you describe. But the SLE 7 does not. Yet I feel like he's very in tune with his social standing and concerned about that. Maybe he's so/sx... he does seem to revel in intensity and intense experiences.
IEI-Fe 4w3
I do think there's an aspect of sx that lends itself more to "intense" experiences than other instincts would, but it's not a general trend I like to note often, due to its connotations.Originally Posted by redbaron
Like... when someone thinks they're sx because of how grr intense they are and need all this intimacy and novelty... they probably aren't. Although, such drives will usually make sense in the context of a real sx person without them needing to demonstrate much.
So... a drive for 'intimacy' in general basically means that the individual is searching for something outside of themselves to fully connect with. Activities are done with this in mind, so it could be as simple as becoming intensively entrenched in a book for hours, to an intimate encounter with another individual. I mean, most people with a spine seek intensity and new experiences; it's more about the energy and fixation behind it with sx'ers (feeling of transience, establishment of singular connection to escape this).
4w3-5w6-8w7
I'm pretty sure I'm sx last. Intimate relationships never have played a pivotal role in my life. I tend to think the whole marriage thing is overrated. Sex too for that matter but I know the sx instinct is not just about sex. I'm torn between the sp/so and the so/sp stackings for myself.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
I PMed the admin of an enneagram forum (http://typewatch.net/) a video of myself once without telling him it was me. He replied with the type he thought I was and also described some things that he thought were instinct related:
“The eyes remind me of this person in the list...7w6 sx/sp Kate Moss...so sx/sp wouldn't surprise me. The eyes communicate a lot of emotion...so the sx is up there. Another thing I notice is the person is protruding forward. The stronger the sx...the more the person "jumps out" of the reserved posture you see in sx-lasts...face close to the camera...or using the arm as a swivel...etc. sx/sps are the most direct in this sense...sx/sos are more diffuse and crazed...less of a solemn looking straight at just you vibe. Maybe sp/sx with strong sx second...sp/sxs are more chill though.”
I don't know how valid it is, but he contrasts sx-first to sx-last a bit, so maybe it can help you?
edit:
This is good too.
maybe a saint is just a dead prick with a good publicist
maybe tommorow's statues are insecure without their foes
go ask the frog what the scorpion knows
With sx-lasts, I would say if it's hard to get to that point of deep connection and they are clearly awkward with that, and don't get past guardedness. With sp firsts not showing intense emotions outwardly. Not very good at conversation when it goes into the getting-to-know-you stuff, especially with sp/so. With so/sp, there may be a group orientedness but a pushing away when trying to get to that deeper level.
I actually am an sx last... There was one sx-dom who described sx last in an sp/so sno matter how many times you talk to an sp/so, the feeling of distance never leaves. I personally wasn't entirely conscious of this until it was pointed out, and it may appear that way to an extreme sx-dom. It's hard for us sx-blinds to know what's missing from us variant wise unless someone with an opposite blindspot, or is extreme in our blindspot points it.
xII se PoLR, 9w1-5w4-2w3 sp/so
Phlegmatic-Melancholic |RCoAI| Fascinator| Newtype-secondary| LEFVl|
#JusticeforJeb_, Water Sheep did nothing wrong, High Inquisitor Of Council of Water Sheep and Water Sheep's protector
Make things right? Who are we to decide when things are right and when they need to be fixed?
yea if someone feels like they have no "sex appeal" to them they're usually sx last. its pretty basic. unfortunately everyone's confused about the sexual instinct because of certain enneagram teachers who have tried to remake the sx instinct to "intimacy instinct"
Lack of hoes
Sx last trait: I spend a lot of time thinking about whether it’s socially or relationally appropriate to reach out/send feelers or approach someone that I like instead of just doing it. I have all of these rules in my head that are routinely broken by Sx types who can just follow their whims and vibe with whoever they want as long as they're receptive
Last edited by Averroes; 10-02-2022 at 12:00 AM.
Chronic "grass is always greener" syndrome