No no no. He said he is only up for sex with emotions.Originally Posted by Azeroffs
Well he devalues Fe a lot.. at least we got that much
No no no. He said he is only up for sex with emotions.Well he devalues Fe a lot.. at least we got that much
That could be either Fi or Fe. If it's more about the emotional connection between both partners then it's Fi. If it's about expression of how they feel about the person, then it's Fe.No no no. He said he is only up for sex with emotions.
The distinction is usually not clear.
ENFj would be my guess.
Yeah I tried to figure out what he meant by emotions...but couldnt....
Also the last time we discussed his type he was like..."well I am sure I am an introvert. I am not sure about socionics type... but I fit the description of autistic person very well. "
mhm does it helps typing him if i tell you that he has ZERO reaction to pushiness or manipulation?
he said that feelings only make people unhappy.
Overall, I'm still leaning toward SLI. He seems really natural and relaxed in the way he holds himself. He seems to be nature oriented and kind of artsy in a light way which makes me think delta. There is absolutely no hint of Fe despite his enjoyable atmosphere.
I would say EII but he seems far to natural while EII tends to be awkward and clumsy.
And he seems too in touch with his surroundings to be ILI.
lol kinda ironic don't you think?he said that feelings only make people unhappy.
Yes! Only if I could remember all the things he said... He has a tendency to self-contradiction...
Yea SLI would fit him very well. But he doesn't agree with SLI typing at all... By the way, he has three close friends and they all are Ni valuers. SxE, LIE and IEI.
I find that supervisees are really easy to get along with at least from the supervisor perspective. If the SxE is SEE then illusionaries get on pretty well. Contraries can get along well, but don't mesh well when with others. Super-ego relations are ok as long as they don't get too close.Yes! Only if I could remember all the things he said... He has a tendency to self-contradiction...
Yea SLI would fit him very well. But he doesn't agree with SLI typing at all... By the way, he has three close friends and they all are Ni valuers. SxE, LIE and IEI.
I find that people only have obvious problems with those that would put down their HA. So, an Fi-unfriendly environment.
Ne-IEE.
Certainty: 99%
I have a good friend who could be his twin. Not only because of the pictures but also because he is weird.
His self-typing is ILI? That fits. Ne-IEEs normaly refuse to categorize anything and they are pretty bad at it.
They don't accept the fact thatis their vulnerable function because their decisions seem logical to them.
I'd call them one of my favourite types. No other type is more fun to be with
Last edited by CheGuevara; 11-15-2009 at 02:08 AM.
Ni-INTj --- Harmonizing Analyst ----
DCNH rox
i haven't read the whole thread; i just went by the fotos.
i got the impression of SLI. could be SEI...but dunno didn't see much emotion on his face, more the calm placid blank SLI face.
then again...usually SLI i wanna say is more conservative and by the book. i don't see many i know braiding their hair and dressing that way. then again what do i know about what people in their 20's are up to stylistically.
so, SEI is a viable type also.
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
I was reading a lot about how functions work from different aspects...
These are types he fits. Sometimes he seems to fit more than one aspect...
Se: LII, EII, ILI, IEI.
Ti: SLI, ILI
Ne: IEI, ILI, SEI, SLI
Fi: SLI, ILI, SEI, IEI
Te: SLI, ILI, EII, ESI
Ni: ILI, IEI (this description he seems to fit 100% perfectly)
Si: IEI, ILI, LII, EII
Fe: ILI, SLI, LSI, LII, EII, ESI
.....
who? me?You are one very very creative ISTP
Reply With Quote
