Ignoring & Demonstrative Functions (Which is stronger/more valued?)

[Joy]

Demonstrative > Ignoring

[CheGuevara]

This is one of the worst topics I've ever seen on this forum. Mostly thanks to Che Guevara. It's as if in a forum about basketball a guy comes and starts judging basketball players on the basis of football rules.

I disagree. It is clear that the demonstrative function is stronger than the ignoring function. There the thread could have ended.

But then labcoat claimed that INTjs are more like ENTjs than like INTps. I disagreed. And the disaster took its course

[Brilliand]

But then labcoat claimed that INTjs are more like ENTjs than like INTps. I disagreed. And the disaster took its course

It was a pretty fun disaster, though. I call it a win.

[CheGuevara]

It was a pretty fun disaster, though. I call it a win.

All the -valuing capitalists are certainly of a different opinion.

[FDG]

I'm not a capitalist...I'd gladly have lived my life on a beach during communist-cuba peak time

[07490]

Here's what Wikisocion has to say about the demonstrative function:

Demonstrative function
A person uses this element mainly as a kind of game, or to ridicule those who he thinks take it too seriously. They often intentionally go against its conventional usage simply to prove a point in favor of their creative function. However, this function is used quite often in private, to produce information of its element to support their creative function when focusing on making contact with the external world.
A person will often have just as sophisticated an understanding of this function as his or her leading function. Unlike the ignoring function it plays a major part in a person's worldview, since as the vulnerable function of one's dual it requires especially delicate attention. Thus, when a person is given information regarding the element in the demonstrative function by someone else, they will tend to take it as obvious information that is irrelevant to completely focus on. One will often use the demonstrative function to defend and further support their beliefs made in the vulnerable function.
The demonstrative function is easiest function to use (after the base function) yet often occurs sporadically. When one experiences a problem regarding this function, one must correct it as it does play a vital part in a person's wordview.

The bolded stuff suggests the demonstrative is stronger and more valued than the ignoring function.

This is so true in my eyes.

[Blaze]

I disagree.

ENTjs ignore (truth and justice).
I don't like talking to them because they are robber barons.

INTps ignore (ideas and adventures).
I don't like talking to them because they are party poopers.

No offence meant!
I'm just using to tell the truth and to make fun.

hahaha love this post

[Blaze]

This is one of the worst topics I've ever seen on this forum. Mostly thanks to Che Guevara. It's as if in a forum about basketball a guy comes and starts judging basketball players on the basis of football rules.

if you just ignore the stuff about capitalism, it's actually a pretty fun thread.