-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
video - nonverbal and what you said
> That IR test is way too long and I don't understand Russian
It takes much lesser time than to do comparable IR check by own typing (monthes).
To get impressions from nonverbal you do not need to understand what people say there.
It's the easiest possibility to get a proof for ESE.
IR test itself shows arguments pro and contra for some types, including ESE.
You may be lesser emotionally expressive in nonverbal than some people, especially on surface level.
I find you as emotional in general. Your nonverbal fits to F types better too. I compare you with T types, taking into account my experience of watching people.
Last edited by Sol; 03-17-2019 at 02:25 PM.