I'm not a person who thinks that everything is possible, in physical world almost every human conception finds its own tangible negation, almost everything is able to state itself wrong and right at same time, science works always with the dilemma of falsifiability. But can exceptions be used to build applicable knowledge and guidelines for our conceptions of reality? Can minor exemplars of the nonexistence of an absolute rule be enough for invalidating the imminent necessity of building guiding models of world representation? If every single law were ruled out due to verification of inherent exceptions to the theoretical system in question, we would have no principle neither law of regulation in our world science, not even the most prosaic of all laws, cause-consequence. I defend that a law should be always be taken as true when its application can be helpful and useful for everyone who has assimilated such law. We always needed a sense of factuality for being the crafty race we are. That's why I state my objection against any unreasonable "debunking eagerness", a mania that is so common on these materialistic days.
There are some intuitions we have that seem to be quite rushed in, or even too shallow, too initial. Some people would even take them as prejudice, as preconceived inferences, but we can be harmful to our own selves if we don't take these insights seriously, at least in my case as a
lead type, I always trust my "prejudices", I never ignore them, and they are always full of inner richness, I can say they are a source of eternal realization for me. Most of the times, our first impression is the best of all.