Type her:
Cindy Crawford (90's supermodel)
vids:
pics:
Type her:
Cindy Crawford (90's supermodel)
vids:
pics:
Last edited by aisa; 04-01-2015 at 07:30 PM.
Did not even look at the videos, extraverted sensor Si/Ne, e3, likely ESE.
Hmm...
Her first husband was Richard Gere (Idk type, I've seen various ideas thrown around, Si/Ne anyway):
Second husband of quite a few years is Randy Gerber and yeah he does seem Se-PoLR with LII being initial impression (reminds me a bit of @Reficulris VI wise):
LsE
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I could see LSE
...in one childhood pic she vibes a bit like DA
She looks like my cousin.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
She looks like Theo James (LSE)?
Some more vids:
bump
She's my dual
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
E, not ESTJ
ESE or LSE.
@aisa she reminds me of you
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Cindy Crawford - ENTJ Jack London
This is the comment you are looking for
I recently out she's read at least one Peter Zeihan book, which struck me as unusual (for a supermodel to be interested in geopolitics). She also studied chemical engineering when she was younger (albeit just for one year, as she moved into modelling), which also struck me as unusual (not just for a supermodel, but a woman generally).
I probably type her EIE>LIE, although I guess in classical Socionics she'd be most likely -leading, so alternatively, LIE>LSE.