liveandletlive

[Ezra]

Alright, fair enough, I was just trying to get my point accross. Clearly it's not the case.

I think niffweed's point is pertinent; differing in focus. So, naturally, conflictors are interested in different areas, so they rarely even need to cooperate.

Nonetheless, niffweed, have you ever spoken to liveandletlive? Properly, I mean?

[Blaze]

So. Diana isn't necessarily an ESI, and you're not necessarily ILE (as you've shown). Minde is an EII. Megan could be anything. discojoe I don't think is an ESI. I don't care what Expat, he or Joy say.

i don't think conflictors/supervision partners necessarily stay away from each other here. actually they interact, but do so carefully, if they are discussing a topic of mutual interest.

[Expat]

i don't think conflictors/supervision partners necessarily stay away from each other here. actually they interact, but do so carefully, if they are discussing a topic of mutual interest.

I agree. I have no problem interacting with Bionicgoat, or snegledmaca, or misutii; I have interacted with Bionicgoat, easily, when working together in the wiki. But it's more difficult to find a "common ground".

[Creepy-Diana]

.

[aestrivex]

Nonetheless, niffweed, have you ever spoken to liveandletlive? Properly, I mean?

meaning...?

[force my hand]

The way I see conflictors on this board is that they just stay away from one another. Take Herzy and Minde; have you ever seen them engage in even a passing of words to one another? No. It simply doesn't happen. And what about Kristiina, or onetreehilluver, and force my hand, or Winterpark? Jack shit occurs between the former and the latter.

I've tried to engage Kristiina before on things like her biology degree, but there's definitely a wall I can't break through. It's not like we conflict, it's like we never connect in the first place. On the other hand, what she writes is often of interest to me, unlike some of the other ENFjs that have posted here (that's not meant to be an insult). I have no reason to interact with onetreehilluver, for example. Interestingly, liveandletlive also falls into that category, but whereas an ENFj is dangerous, the ESFp is harmless.

[Ezra]

I agree. I have no problem interacting with Bionicgoat, or snegledmaca, or misutii; I have interacted with Bionicgoat, easily, when working together in the wiki. But it's more difficult to find a "common ground".

Well, Bionicgoat thinks he's an EII, so I'm not surprised.

meaning...?

You're ILI. She's SEE. Do you interact with her, given that you're duals?

Interestingly, liveandletlive also falls into that category, but whereas an ENFj is dangerous, the ESFp is harmless.

How is the EIE dangerous?

[Expat]

Well, Bionicgoat thinks he's an EII, so I'm not surprised

Does he now? The last time I discussed socionics with him (in which he's not that interested) he did think he was ISFp.

[aestrivex]

You're ILI. She's SEE. Do you interact with her, given that you're duals?

duality is not required for interaction. i believe i understand your question, however, and the answer is this: i don't know.

[Dioklecian]

I think it's fairly obvious that we've got ourselves an SEE here, but I want a general consensus anyway.

I disagree.

[Ezra]

Does he now? The last time I discussed socionics with him (in which he's not that interested) he did think he was ISFp.

One word: socionix.

I disagree.

Come on then. Give your opinion. Don't make some outlandish statement, with no evidence with which to back it up. Call yourself an LII? Explain yourself.

[Creepy-Diana]

.

[Creepy-bg]

In other words you didn't bother asking him, or reading what he has said about himself here or there then? You just took the word of some other people and the type listed on his profile there, eh?

Last time I talked to him about his type, he seemed to believe ISFp was more fitting than INFj. But said he really did not care much one way or the other.

I don't care

the socionics thing isn't too important to me ATM. I have good e-friends I talk to here and on the socionix forum. If it means I don't have to spend time talking about/proving/arguing socionics stuff I'm perfectly happy with one group saying one thing and the other saying something else.

[Ezra]

In other words you didn't bother asking him, or reading what he has said about himself here or there then? You just took the word of some other people and the type listed on his profile there, eh?

No, I took his word, actually. I think Bionicgoat is easily persuadable, which I assumed you'd picked up from the single word. Evidently not.

[Creepy-bg]

No, I took his word, actually. I think Bionicgoat is easily persuadable, which I assumed you'd picked up from the single word. Evidently not.

Ezra, assuming things about my personality without having interracted with me beyond a little forum grabass here and there is a mistake. I think you probably confuse not careing for being easily pursuaded. If I don't give a shit about something I can easily just shrug or semi-agree with the concept (as a possibility).

[munenori2]

BG!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111

[Ezra]

I think you probably confuse not careing for being easily pursuaded.

Yeah, you're right.

BG!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111

Are you sure you're EII?