I am not questioning my type, but I am curious to know what you guys type me as, because by now I have been typed as so many different types on this forum.
So yeah, this poll serves as some weird kind of self amusement.
I am not questioning my type, but I am curious to know what you guys type me as, because by now I have been typed as so many different types on this forum.
So yeah, this poll serves as some weird kind of self amusement.
I trust your typing sufficiently to agree with IEI.
CETERUM AUTEM CENSEO WASHINGTON D.C. ESSE DELENDAM
My loose impression has been ethical introvert, not ESI, merry more likely than serious, with LII a possible wildcard. I don't object to IEI even though I can see where people might take your calmness as judiciousness or whatever. But I don't have a clear enough opinion to vote.
fun will not be complete without your video-interview
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...=1#post1096450
This statement itself says everything, it's typical for Te polr to do something for fun while rejecting practicality (doing things for the sake of amusement annoys me but you're over the top intuitive like me, that's why I'm 100% sure you're IEI as heeeell). Although on another level, I suspect that you simply want to... analyze our reactions mmhh
That's a good question because intuitive things can hardly be explained...
Just kidding. I have 5 parameters for intuition, she meets all of them: head-in-the-clouds > down-to-earth, sees the big picture > sees details (I've seen her being quite detailed here and there but she's rather abstract in general), deals with ideas > surroundings, cerebral > physical focus, theoretical > practical.
it may be unhelpful to say it, but I have no reason to doubt your self-typing.
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
How many calendars do you keep at home and what's your favorite game
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 10-01-2016 at 10:56 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
please answer maritsa's question were all dying to hear it
I don't doubt your self-typing typing btw, which is about as helpful as my last comment.
EII, IEE, ILE, LII, some chance of SxI. The tone of your posts is calm, the content is overly theoretical. Sometimes it seems like you want people to believe your theories based on you saying this is what you think + your friendly agreeable disposition, with little experience and evidence to support your words, which is seen in some other Ti/Fi + SiNe posts on here.
Spot on, but you described the lack of which can only point to IEI since she's so theoretical, SEI would be hands-on. Ni-Ti theories all the way aka imagining a lot of systematizations. She also seems hug- and squeezable like a seeking type, and this is first-hand information from another Ni-lead hehe.
A SLE-Se Sx/Sp dual getting along with her seems legit.
What would "hands-on" look like in a person discussing socionics? I think it would look like sis. She's not diving into the meaning of the elements or coming up with new theories, but she applies existing knowledge to daily life eg, 'here are relationship rankings based on how the elements are known to interact,' and her method is based on tying socionics concepts to behaviors in an easily observable and traceable way using existing common knowledge.
I would join a Sol fan club. Best standup routine east of the Vistula.
CETERUM AUTEM CENSEO WASHINGTON D.C. ESSE DELENDAM
Not coming up with new theories would be the exact qualifier for Beta over Alpha though, even if her Ne is strong it's still unvalued. Ni is also not about meaning. It's a function of temporal axes.
As well as observable/traceable ways of common knowledge, which lacks the subjective focus of Si and indicates Se instead. SEI delves into their tangible perception. IEI is devoid of that.
Cool, but I wasn't typing her or making any of the inferences you imply I was (eg ni=meaning). I was just questioning the premise that she is theoretical > hands on. I don't have a type in my mind for her.
Practical application of common knowledge is something I would associate with Te before any other function, honestly. But I don't know how this fits in along with other things about her (like how Fe creative seems a good fit).
The absence of wouldn't necessarily point to Te Polr IEI or SEi typing. This could indicate the PoLR, sure, but it can also be ignoring function (why it's being omitted and ignored) or suggestive one (which is listed as 1 dimensional function at Wikisocion, making its expression similar to PoLR). I think this only mean that Sis doesn't have strong Te and sensing functions, but this doesn't rule out other type options as I see it--which to tally up would be: ( Intuition > sensing ; weak or absent Te > Te ego ) => IEI, EII, EIE, IEE, LII, and ILE -- and there's nothing too convincing that IEI overtakes other options (besides going with Sis' own self-typing and saying that she knows herself best).
No comment on the hug- and squeezable as I haven't seen a picture of Sis as of yet
Sis is not coming up with radically new theories, but then none of the other Ne posters are on this forum. The Alpha NT memberbase here seems to busy with rearranging the old stuff and using it on their relationships, which is something that Sis has also been doing in blog entries. I don't see how this precludes valued Ne. Ne isn't quite the creativity function that spits out new theories left and right, which is visible on this very forum.
This forum has got many posters who type themselves as Ne types, with most others agreeing, yet they don't come up with anything new on regular basis, and keep rehashing the same model A and information elements that were created in the past century.
Imho, coming up with new ideas and theories is a function of creative talent, or genius in rare cases -- it is not a function of Ne.
Again, I was pointing out what I see, not positing a type.
i notice most with you. i don't know what else you would be other than IEI though. when i considered both lead types, it didn't fit right.
I think you're IEI
I also think you're IEI. You give a rational impression or INXj if you want often, but all in all, there are much more inconsistencies for other types than there are for IEI.
IEI final
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html