Quote Originally Posted by Subteigh View Post
?
Oh, it's you sub. You sure do switch pics often. Anyhow, I'll list these with explanations:

Static - Dynamic: I am completely unsure about this one. This is a reinin I've wanted to crack open for quite some time by now. My writing and talking sure does leave a dynamic taste, but I am not sure if dynamic = dynamic(this is what happens when you let a bunch of alpha NTs develop something).

Positive - Negative: I am also unsure about this one. I've tried capturing it multiple times, but it's so fiddly, god dam!

Asking - Declaring: I do love to hear myself speak, but then I am not the one to prefer the shotgun approach to basically anything. With that said, I feel like I prefer dialogues.

Tactical - Strategic: This is very hard to determine. On one hand, I feel free if I am just free to choose what to do and how to do it without any real goal. Otoh, I severely dislike minecraft and such things. I very much need a goal. With that said, I feel like I prefer tactics.

Constructive - Emotive: This one is easy. I very much like returning to things that actually left positive impression on me(and equally avoid things that left the negative one). When I actually acquire an emotional state, it lasts long and you can count on it. I also put more stress on what has been said. All constr things.

Process - Result: This one was tricky but I simply don't have the willpower to do a whole thing in one sitting. I very much prefer to break it down into multiple runs so to speak. I thought for a long time I was actually on the side of process, but I simply am not.

Yielding - Obstinate: A tricky one to be sure. I feel like I could be on the yielding side, but then again I can be very stubborn. But about the core of this dichotomy, no I won't pursue something if resources are inadequate. I simply won't. That's why I think yielding fits me better.

Carefree - Farsighted: Again, I feel like I could be more on the FS side. I am simply not willing(as in "no way jose") to discard prior experience, but I don't completely focus on predicting everything either. Because you really can't predict everything even with a help of a modern Supercomputer("Infinite diversity in infinite combinations", right ?).

Subjective - Objective: Hell, I don't believe that an objective thought can really exist. Maybe it can, who knows? Anyhow, I constantly use the term "fun", I shift the perspectives of situations(otoh, but then again etc) etc. It wasn't difficult at all to determine this one.

Reasonable - Decisive: Well, that wasn't so bad, was it? I am in no rush, I like to take my time with decisions, love just, well not doing nothing, but rather doing comfortable things etc. Easy.

Aristocratic - Democratic: Everyone is an individual, first and foremost. No matter how I call him, he is a person and I treat him as such. I hate bad, evil, malignant dumbfucks, not all dumbfucks(there are goofy dumbfucks or pensive dumbfucks, why would I hate such?). And everyone should be treated according to his traits first. But I DO think that when it comes to positions, only the best people should be placed in those. Who knows, maybe I am aristo after all. Kinda doubt it, but still...

Now, let's see to which types do most of these lead: x / total sure of = y% (x / total RD = z%) {alternative based upon Aristo} - reinins used are the bolded above + SFj(10 in total).

ESI: 8 / 10 = 80% ( 8 / 15 = 53,3% ) { 70% , 46,6% }
ESE: 8 / 10 = 80% ( 8 / 15 = 53,3% ) { 70% , 46,6% }
SLE: 5 / 10 = 50% ( 5 / 15 = 33% ) { 60% , 40% }
EIE: 5 / 10 = 50% ( 5 / 15 = 33% ) { 60% , 40% }
SEE: 5 / 10 = 50% ( 33% ) { 40% , 26,6% }
SEI: 6 / 10 = 60% ( 6 / 15 = 40% ) { 50% , 33% }
LSI: 4 / 10 = 40% ( 4 / 15 = 26,6% ) { 50% , 33%}
IEI: 7 / 10 = 70% ( 7 / 15 = 46,6% ) {depending upon SINGLE dichotomy(Aristo), this one could emerge at the top! - 80% , 53,3% }
IEE: 5 / 10 = 50% ( 33% ) { 60% , 40% }
EII: 6 / 10 = 60% ( 40% ) { 70% , 46,6% }
LSE: 6 / 10 = 60% ( 40% ) { 70% , 46,6% }
SLI: 5 / 10 = 50% ( 33% ) { 60% , 40% }
LIE: 4 / 10 = 40% ( 26,6% ) { 30% , 20% }
ILI: 4 / 10 = 40% ( 26,6% ) { 30% , 20% }
ILE: 7 / 10 = 70% ( 46,6% ) { 60% , 40% }
LII: 6 / 10 = 60% ( 40% ) { 50% , 33% }

Order:

ESI = ESE > IEI = ILE > SEI = EII = LSE = LII > SLE = EIE = SEE = IEE = SLI > LSI = ILI = LIE

Alternate Order:

IEI > ESI = ESE = EII = LSE > SLE = EIE = IEE = SLI = ILE > SEI = LSI = LII > SEE > ILI = LIE


Make of that what you will, but some inferences can be made:

1. F types are very strong. Especially ESI, ESE and IEI.
2. ILI and LIE are dead to me(constantly last).
3. Quadra strengths are as follow: Alpha >> Delta > Gamma ~ Beta (alt: Delta > Beta > Alpha >> Gamma) { average: Alpha > Delta > Beta >> Gamma }