Results 1 to 34 of 34

Thread: Communication Styles vs Romancing styles?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    not gonna be around as much anymore
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    TIM
    C-IEE
    Posts
    1,255
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slacker View Post
    Why? What's the vale in further categorizing them?
    I don't know. I'm just in that sort of mood right now, I guess.
    My life's work (haha):
    http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/blog.php?b=709
    Input, PLEASEAnd thank you

  2. #2
    c esi-se 6w7 spsx ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    the center of the universe
    Posts
    15,829
    Mentioned
    914 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    i do think it might be interesting to examine the rational functions further as slater did but i'm kind of wary about suggestions to change whats already pretty established (having EII-LSE be victim-aggressor, for example).

  3. #3
    not gonna be around as much anymore
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    TIM
    C-IEE
    Posts
    1,255
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by laghlagh View Post
    i do think it might be interesting to examine the rational functions further as slater did but i'm kind of wary about suggestions to change whats already pretty established (having EII-LSE be victim-aggressor, for example).
    Yeah, I know...really. I was more just being hypothetical with the idea of rearranging the Romantic types. But, it was to make a point...Just don't ask me what that point was...
    My life's work (haha):
    http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/blog.php?b=709
    Input, PLEASEAnd thank you

  4. #4
    stray's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    862
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    EII-LSE victim aggressor is just fuel for the fire that most EIIs are trying to put out to begin with.

  5. #5
    c esi-se 6w7 spsx ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    the center of the universe
    Posts
    15,829
    Mentioned
    914 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pianosinger View Post
    Yeah, I know...really. I was more just being hypothetical with the idea of rearranging the Romantic types. But, it was to make a point...Just don't ask me what that point was...
    i think i have an idea of where you're coming from. i guess what it comes down to is that every single one of the 16 types will approach things like romance and communication differently based on functional arrangement including the position of all of their functions - base, creative, demonstrative, etc. and the theories placed on top of that like the erotic roles and stuff are extras outside of the model that make more categories to help with conceptualizing things. they're...supplemental? so you could keep creating categories to narrow them down further if you really wanted to but it isn't necessary. does that make sense?

    idk. i think this thread needs Ti or sth. lol.

  6. #6
    not gonna be around as much anymore
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    TIM
    C-IEE
    Posts
    1,255
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by laghlagh View Post
    idk. i think this thread needs Ti or sth. lol.
    yeah, really...but then, that would probably spoil my fun...
    My life's work (haha):
    http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/blog.php?b=709
    Input, PLEASEAnd thank you

  7. #7
    stray's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    862
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't see why EIE and LIE would be infantile either. goes hand in hand with . It's out of place to see one toss out a singular direction or need in favor of something Ne-like. And LIIs and EIIs generally do not goad or challenge people in a way Victim does. Some EIIs might be meek, but that's what a Victim is. A Victim could be cocky or purposely play a lot of games.. what they want is someone to meet the challenge (theoretically speaking).

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •