I´d like to hear opinions.
although I am quite sure I am EST just don´t know the last letter.
What I am totally sure about is I´m an ST type.
but open to opinions of course.
I´d like to hear opinions.
although I am quite sure I am EST just don´t know the last letter.
What I am totally sure about is I´m an ST type.
but open to opinions of course.
Last edited by Airman; 04-02-2010 at 02:22 AM.
Let's just wait patiently for Maritsa ...
Delta ST, yeah
The end is nigh
STj
I am working on the E/I...a few moments please.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 04-01-2010 at 04:38 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
fwiw, he does look like an ISTp I know.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 04-01-2010 at 05:39 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'd say you look more ESTj than ESTp in that photo.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
I think this points more to ESTJ than to ESTP , right?
what I really don´t get is how you define E/I in socionics.
Simply, if you dangle an object in front of an E type, their brain is programed to take in it's form wheather that form is shape ( ) or character ( ). So, they will look at it carefully, or snap shot abosorb it.
Introverts will not focus their eyes on the object will try to absorb and connect it to an internal character or shape of the object hence ( ) or ().
I look at your eyes in the picture to see if you're looking at the camera or your internal impression of the camera, or your internal impression of your self in that moment
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
interesting.
I mostly look at the cameras, especially that part which captures the shots, but I understand what you said. I focus on the physical lens of the camera.
An I type would look at his internal impression of the camera so his eyes would seem a little distant and out of focus.
I think Se-valuing from how you describe yourself in other threads.
E/I : Extraversion and introversion - Wikisocion .
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 04-01-2010 at 08:16 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 04-01-2010 at 10:29 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
from these criteria:
Extraverted types
1. Psychic energy more often flows outwards.
2. Energy level increases when interacting with a large group of people.
3. Energy level decreases when they are alone.
4. Energy level is generally higher.
5. More often focused on their surroundings.
6. Tend to be more active and initiating.
7. Often make new friends easily.
8. Often better at presenting themselves.
9. Often prefer to work in a team.
Introverted types
1. Psychic energy more often flows inwards.
2. Energy level increases when they are alone.
3. Energy level decreases when interacting with a large group of people.
4. Energy level is generally lower.
5. More often focused on their thoughts and feelings.
6. Tend to be more passive, less initiating.
7. Often do not have many friends.
8. Often better at concentrating.
9. Often prefer to work alone.
I am definitely an E.
that gives me EST but I´m still in doubt about J or P, which doubt is probably cleared by my total attraction to INFJ girls.
but that could be a highly sexual ESTP also couldn´t it? anyway I dont like agression and I don´t see life as a power-struggle or some sort of testing of my willpower and endurance, to me this sounds masochistic not wise or smart.
all ESTj's are highly sexual and hedonistic and same goes for ESFj's. Their sexual style is different.
My cousin who is ESFj preferes to prolong pleasure maybe have sex once per week with lots of forplay every day up to that point. They like lots of physical contact, but may or may not involve sex, lots of kissing. This is true of every ESFj that I have asked.
Well, you can imagine ESTj preference for that
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 04-01-2010 at 10:15 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Would you be able to post a side picture of yourself?
A forum member, Rasputin, is also ESTj with enneagram 1w9, so that's one more piece of the puzzle there
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 04-01-2010 at 11:02 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
.
Last edited by anou; 04-01-2010 at 11:10 PM.
Maritsa, all this flirting and sexual talk that's going on is making it appear as if you are easy... Look after yourself :/. Anyone can pose as your dual irl, and then take advantage of you.
Actually I can´t
what are you trying to transmit or imply here?
Lobo, will you stop being jealous of my friendship with Maritsa? I already told you to tell that girl who kicked you to go to hell and go for a walk and get some conversation going on with some other girl. Moderate alcohol consumption may help if you have enough age for that. It will soften your situation of having been hurt if you get to know a good girl so move on, man.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I got what you meant, Maritsa.
Mathematics:
If ESFJs like to have lots of physical contact such as kissing and foreplay everyday, then ESTJs like to have lots of hard perverted sex everyday, is this the logic? More rational than their F counterparts...
I will take a side pic and post it here Maritsa.
Just because it is YOU who´s asking
1w9?
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
yes that´s my enneagram type.
I got to know socionics only some months ago, through an enneagram discussion group.
I´ve been involved with enneagram for some 8 years now. It´s amazing and I find it a little too simplistic but it has a spiritual side, which socionics does not.
A lot of misidentification occurs on enneagram (much more than on socionics I guess) so for some two years I was identified wrongly. Then I got another identification from a therapist who had identified me wrongly and I got really interested in the enneagram. It turned out that his second guess was right.
Why are you asking?
ah I see you´re a 8w9.
well ESTJ seems to be very common among 1s and 8s because of the bouts of anger, authoritatian style, coldness, but the enneagram 8 fits better as an ESTP. More full of energy and confrontational, although both 1 and 8 like doing justice.
Hm, I don't know quite what to think of you yet, Airborne. I have some thoughts, but I'm not sure if you'd want to hear all of them.
Welcome, by the way.
Oh, to find you in dreams - mixing prior, analog, and never-beens... facts slip and turn and change with little lucidity. except the strong, permeating reality of emotion.
Go ahead Minde. Of course I´d like to hear them all.
though the importance I may attach to anyone´s thoughts here about me may not be a lot, because I wrote little stuff here up to now.
but bring it on, I´m curious about your thoughts now that you said you have thoughts about me. would that be a 'dualizing' flertation of yours? :wink:
I´m all yours baby. Speak your mind.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Thank you for your point here Maritsa. I see there is some disagreement among members on Minde´s type.
Do I see some jealousy here Maritsa? Don´t be worried honey, I and Minde... it was just a one-night stand. It won´t last long because she´s ISFP. So don´t worry my dear. lol.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html