ENTp
ENTp
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
I think Ezra is Fe ISFp due to how much I enjoy his antics.
The end is nigh
It's pretty obvious he is Se ego imo. I swear to god some people on this site are just terrible at typing people.
Except that is not the criteria I use to determine if someone is Se ego. In fact that's the exact problem I am talking about. People need to actually take the time to learn what the information elements are, how they manifest and how they interact with the environment rather than just rely on hopeless sterotyping like "Se egos like to argue, therefore anyone who defends their points is Se ego" "NTs are intellectuals, if you show any proficiency in intellectual/scientific discussions you are an NT" " NFs are artists, therefore if you practise any art you are probably NF" or "STs like to work with their hands, therefore if you work with their hands you are ST".
This is literally what I see 80% of the people here doing with every single typing and it's completely the wrong way to go about it, albeit my examples are a little simplified.
MM, you totally missed the point.
AA's making a satirical comment about how anyone who disagrees with niff is auto-placed in beta.
Wond'ring aloud, How we feel today. Last night sipped the sunset, My hand in her hair. We are our own saviours, As we start both our hearts, Beating life Into each other. ~Ian Anderson
Bow down, for I am the True Ezra.
"If you can find out little melodies for yourself on the piano it is all very well. But if they come of themselves when you are not at the piano, then you have still greater reason to rejoice; for then the inner sense of music is astir in you. The fingers must make what the head wills, not vice versa."- Robert Schumann
EZRA is not SLE type....
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I will point out the functions that I see from now on. Tip for you....Do what you do, and leave me to do what I do best.
That way you won't get annoyed.
I don't care what you find annoying anyway. You can't begin to understand me or what to do for me let alone to find what I do annoying.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm saying that what he wrote is blatantly Te.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
If I kill someone, they'll kill me back...so I shouldn't kill anybody until after they've finished killing me and each other.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You don't know shit about who you are, perhapse trying to look in the mirror will lend you a perspective on what you do on the outside rather then on the inside.
If you should know anything about my type, it's that I do bug the living daylights out of my duals to bring them in a state of grumbling so that they become ready to accept the information that I offer them. So, go ahead and be utterly emotional and frustrated or anoyed, either way, it has no impact on my psyche because this is how the information is supposed to flow.
Without this, you will be incapable of receiving and adjusting information that you have WRONG or interprete incorrectly.
But, now, you arrogantly pride yourself in knowing who I am and what types others are without correctly being able to interpret their functions and how they use them as well as when they use them, or when they should/shouldn't use them.
This is comming from someone who pretends to have an education in socionics, Please!!! Save me from your lunacy.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
lol
Then explain your crying on cam in tinychat after I became emotional and frustrated. What is that other than something having an effect on your psyche?If you should know anything about my type, it's that I do bug the living daylights out of my duals to bring them in a state of grumbling so that they become ready to accept the information that I offer them. So, go ahead and be utterly emotional and frustrated or anoyed, either way, it has no impact on my psyche because this is how the information is supposed to flow.
Projection, especially the bold part.Without this, you will be incapable of receiving and adjusting information that you have WRONG or interprete incorrectly.
But, now, you arrogantly pride yourself in knowing who I am and what types others are without correctly being able to interpret their functions and how they use them as well as when they use them, or when they should/shouldn't use them.
This is comming from someone who pretends to have an education in socionics, Please!!! Save me from your lunacy.