Well, my last thread was a
bit of a fail, so I'm going to cut my losses and say that I
might revisit it and try to mine it for "misconceptions about ENFps".
...
Yeah, 'sif that'll ever happen.
So, here's the dealio: we're going to have a little chat about what you think makes and breaks an ENFp typing. Fellow ENFps, don't be afraid! Try and look at it from "It looks that way, but to us, what's going on is...", perhaps.
And try to keep the logical arguments toned down, or you'll scare us all away. Worse still, you could drag our duals into the fray
If you need a jump start, here's two categories for you to fill:
An ENFp can't be...
An ENFp is often...
(Later thought:
http://wikisocion.org/en/index.php?t...s_in_socionics <- I guess I'm trying to counteract this, especially the last few headings).