I wonder if it's this:
From http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ad.php?t=18816
I could never respect:
I have to admit I probably was in an extremely agitated state when making this post
I wonder if it's this:
From http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ad.php?t=18816
I could never respect:
I have to admit I probably was in an extremely agitated state when making this post
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
I don't think this was it, but this one too seems to appeal for understanding where such an appeal should not be made. People pay for stuff and they have a right to have delivered what they have paid for. Unless there is a situation of majeure, you can do that, and typically, people will respect that. Such is the critical nature of Te, which does not allow for incompetence and lame excuses for things that haven't been taken care of properly, but should have been.
I think what I was referring to was even more anti-Te. But don't waste your time on trying to find it.
You are not a Te valuer imho.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
That's difficult to answer in a few short words, it's easiest to understand it in its pathological form:
17. UNRELENTING STANDARDS / HYPERCRITICALNESS (US)
The underlying belief that one must strive to meet very high internalized standards of behavior and performance, usually to avoid criticism. Typically results in feelings of pressure or difficulty slowing down; and in hypercriticalness toward oneself and others. Must involve significant impairment in: pleasure, relaxation, health, self-esteem, sense of accomplishment, or satisfying relationships.
Unrelenting standards typically present as: (a) perfectionism, inordinate attention to detail, or an underestimate of how good one's own performance is relative to the norm; (b) rigid rules and “shoulds” in many areas of life, including unrealistically high moral, ethical, cultural, or religious precepts; or (c) preoccupation with time and efficiency, so that more can be accomplished.
source: http://www.schematherapy.com/id73.htm
If you want to understand this in greater detail, try one of these books:
Reinventing your Life
Schema Therapy, a Practitioners Guide
Both are written by Jeffrey E. Young and contain chapters on Unrelenting Standards. Once you have an understanding of this schema, you can extrapolate to less pathological forms and understand Te.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
so why would you use the pathological description? at this point i can barely, if at all, see Te described in that and it only reminds me vaguely of ashton's tendency to type sick & possessive men who beat their wives senseless as ESTj heh.
i'm probably not in your quadra and i really don't know where the pizza hut account is, only the posts that tereg has linked.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
I read through some of this stuff--and bearing in mind that authors were describing a pathology, I've noticed many of these same traits (to less pathological degrees, hehe, sometimes,) in my best friends, two in particular--both I've typed INTp... In other words, this makes sense to me for Te. Thank you.
P.S. Many ppl seem to type Implied as IXTp... I haven't seen pictures/videos, or read Implied's posting history thoroughly, etc, so I can't comment with any real understanding.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
the person being described is unhealthy (obviously, sorry for stating the obvious)--that said, in your mind, maybe try to minimize the description and see if it matches up with some of your INTp friends..?
I was in a band with a INTp once... "Unrelenting standards" haha is a pretty good way to describe his use of the studio/equipment and the recording process... But I appreciated that in him, and honestly, wanted it myself... The songs would've been sheisse without him.
consentingadult, what you're saying is: tereg needs Ti rather than Te, right..? Have you seen this manifested?
The ISTps and ESTjs I know do not have "unrelenting standards". Te + Ni is different than Te + Si.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Yes, but not in him, but rather in the feelings he invokes in me: he asks questions that can help him to build a system (provide him understanding), which causes fatigue in me, I have the habit of answering Ti questions with Te answers, which makes me realize I'm not addressing his questions properly, so I don't think I'm very helpful. I wonder why there aren't any ILEs responding to him. Perhaps I'm wrong about him being SEI.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
i'm still not really sure what about the pizza hut incident had to do with not being Te-valuing. it sounded like excuses he made were rather legit, imo. it's not like you can magically prevent a robbery or like anyone is thinking of customers post-robbery/crisis-situation. if the people you type as ISTps/ESTjs don't respect these things, we can easily call them jackasses as opposed to Te-valuers.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei