This isn't a set of concepts that is easy to define or describe. Concepts such as intuition is not well understood in psychologyI
ophy, intuition for a long time wasn't even taken seriously in psychology and philosophy.
Recently I have been studying intuition and I came upon this site, which actually coincides with a book I am reading.
http://artificial-intuition.com/
This is the site.
As far as the book.
This is the book.
http://www.amazon.com/G%C3%B6del-Esc.../dp/0465026567
The ideas presented on the site is fairly good about intuition, and how it's implementation might be achieved artificially, as well as problems and pitfalls. I think his use of Artificial Intuition is mostly
but it's still a valid look at intuition in general and it's usage.
This site also deal with the problem of intuition vs logic, a subset of the classic problem of perception vs logos, and many variations of irrational vs rational. The problem is probably central problem of different modes of cognition. It's not trivial.
BTW from what I can tell of this project, it is likely a total failure. From even a glance at how it was approached, I can say it was dead endish from a exploratory standpoint and useless from a commercial one. However this doesn't mean the thoughts aren't a useful puzzle piece. And if they actually made something that work it might be usable. Also this individual in my opinion totally misread the book I talked about amongst other texts which she references.