Originally Posted by
Pinocchio
I agree with Quasi. Interesting enough, an ILI friend of mine, knowledgeable of Socionics, type them that way, Architect = ILI. My opinion is the other way around and I'm trying to figure out where the confusion comes from, is this ILI-LII such a big problem, or is it because of Keirsey's keywords? (INTp = The Architect).
IMO the Architect appears that resolute Ti Rational, who "calculated" everything in advance and all is determined with no error, being correctly evaluated. Neo seems that Te type who's convinced that there's a solution to everything and the future depends very much on individual decisions.