Originally Posted by
snegledmaca
What makes you say that? That is, elaborate.
Hmm, as response to that I'd say so does everybody, but I'm not sure. What do you think of this description of Se dominance?
"A Ni valuing type, on the other hand, goes from one goal to another, seeing opportunities as they emerge, changing direction as the wind blows. They are in constant search for Ni, taking up different profession, careers, essentially drifting, until they find their purpose, goal, vision. Which they then develop with intensity and rigor. Ok, that would be more of a Se dominant thing. Se creative would make more of an effort to try to nullify Ne with being much more set in their ways. Resisting change much like the Si ego, but unlike them with passion and rigor, that is, with strong Se determination and certainty. They do not act because they are frightened and scared that they will lose their comfortable position they have set up for themselves, genuinely uncertain of what tomorrow will bring and desperately trying to cling to the familiar, to what they have experience in dealing with. "
"Like I said, Se dominants have decisiveness, they see opportunities as they arise around them, they seize the day. But the issue is of not knowing what to do from then on. They might get their hands on some cash, but where from here? What to do now? This sets them adrift. They tend to focus on the short term, seeking relief in small time seizing of opportunities in a more or less random manner. They do not have a plan or vision of how to develop what they do have. This is where Ni steps in. It directs the Se. It tells it what is needed to be done, where to go from now. Se stops being random and Se and Ni together accomplish an applicable accumulation of power."
Do you identify with it?