Enough said.
Enough said.
I'm not sure, to be honest -- I miss the discussions. Can you point me towards the threads discussing your type? Sorry, I've not really followed everything here lately.
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
It's not a matter of whether or not you're "accepted" in Gamma. It's a matter of whether or not you're a Fi or Se type. And I really cannot see it.
Did you see the thread about emotional expressiveness in INFps? It's in General Discussion.
.
Ah yes, I remember now.Originally Posted by Diana
That does make ISFj unlikely.
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
Yup, I read it. I don't think I'm an emotionally expressive person. According to my ISFp friends, I sound aggressive and instructional when I'm passionate about a subject I'm interested in, but nearly monotonous when talking about day-to-day affairs. That probably speaks against or .Originally Posted by Joy
I wouldn't make that assumption. It just means you're not Fe dominant.
.
what do you relate with in the ISFj descriptions?
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
I definitely have reasons for considering ISFj, rather than changing my type based on my whims and fancies. I will elaborate further after work.
Anyway, just my 2 cents.
I know identicals who utterly hate each other.
INTp
sx/sp
.
Yeah, more details please.Originally Posted by Diana
After reading the functional descriptions of ISFj, I feel that I identify a lot with them, such as the ones under wikisocion (ISFj descriptions) and socioscope (ESI descriptions). Moreover, it has been pointed out to me quite often that my posts reflect a much stronger preference for rather than . In fact, there isn't any post which shows or -seeking attitude or behavior so far.
For what it is worth, I do not get much Ne from INFjs. But then again, for me, when I think of Ne, I have been thinking of "alpha Ne" for so long. Delta Ne may just be much different. Like, in my interactions with rockclimber (hardcore INFj), I do not feel much Ne in a direct sense, but in her beliefs and understandings, in terms of the Ne/Si axis, that is how I can notice it most. It is different from what I notice in terms of INTjs and ENTps.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Hmm, I know what you mean about INFjs (at least here) seeming less focused on Ne than INTjs. Although maybe it's that we have more INFj-Fis and INTj-Nes than vice-versa.Originally Posted by UDP
But if it isn't, do you think that as far as Ne-Si goes, Alpha focuses more on Ne and Delta focuses more on Si? I don't mean to say that the Delta NFs would have weaker Ne than the Alpha NTs, or the Alpha SFs weaker Si than the Delta STs, but I'm talking about outwardness. It seems like Alpha is associated most with working with inventions, with possibilities, and Delta with comfort and peacefulness. Isn't that Ne and Si?
Just a thought.
Originally Posted by Logos
Retired from posting and drawing Social Security. E-mail or PM to contact.
I pity your souls
I think it's Ti and Fi-- relationships.Originally Posted by Elro
hmm.
Originally Posted by Logos
Retired from posting and drawing Social Security. E-mail or PM to contact.
I pity your souls
I know these ESTps who hate each other. Hate each guts. And they seem to irritate each other by challenging each other more all the time. Umm. They disagree with each other's believes and values. This seemed to spark their quarrels.Originally Posted by Diana
I think it depends on the reason why you dislike someone.
I don't know much about ISFjs though.
INTp
sx/sp
.
You forgot a few:Originally Posted by ifmd95
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Someone posted the link to the thread about her saying simon is mean. And simon is ISFj?Originally Posted by Diana
I was just trying to point out that identicals don't have to like each other.
INTp
sx/sp
.
like?Originally Posted by Diana
INTp
sx/sp
.
That could be a point for Aristocracy.
Yes. i agree with that. Nvm. I misunderstood, was thinking of something else.Originally Posted by Diana
Anyway, i was always under the impression that eunice is from the Si quadras. She seems to value Si IMO.
INTp
sx/sp
ISFp wouldn't be crazy. INFp seems likely as well. Perhaps more so.
I think the other INFps here (except raisonpure) would most likely disagree that I'm one of them.Originally Posted by Joy
It depends. I can feel unconfident about it due to my weak . For instance, I don't consider myself a natural-born athlete and I always feel uncomfortable during P.E. (Physical Ed.) classes back then because I'm conscious about showing my inability to others and worry unnecessarily that I will be rejected by my classmates. I also took longer time than others to familiarize myself with activities as well eg. learning musical instruments, drawing (I can't draw!), sports, sewing, cooking, dress well, putting on makeup, learning to drive etc. To me, everyone else seems to be very confident about fulfilling basic wants and needs, and yet I'm struggling with something that is supposed to be human nature.Originally Posted by Mea
EDIT: I just realized what I had written speaks against types, including ISFj. Oh well.
Do you see yourself as being similar to fever?
Most of those are only superficially related to Si. Many ISFps I know dislike putting on makeup or consider themselves bad at it. Si is more about knowing how to keep yourself in a psychologically healthy, balanced state. If you push yourself to do unhealthy things because you feel like you have to (or more importantly, if you do this without being fully aware why exactly it is unhealthy), then INxj is more likely.Originally Posted by eunice
they consider themselves bad at it?Originally Posted by thehotelambush
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Yes. It's not an essential part of Si.
Actually, I think Si types, especially Si dominants, prefer to go au naturel when it comes to make-up. It's more of an Se thing, actually.
Picking on diamond8 and FDG here...
A basic psychological fact - dancing spontaneously makes you feel good - is very obvious to a type with strong Si, but an intuitive type is not so sure. That's Si.Originally Posted by FDG
In the case of Si dominants, yes. But I agree with what implied seemed to be implying -- they may prefer to go without make-up, but I don't think it's typical of ISFps at all to consider themselves bad at it.Originally Posted by thehotelambush
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
Ridiculous!Originally Posted by ifmd95
Alright the better question here, am I accepted by Gamma? Maybe I should make another thread so people can tell me where I belong?!?! Yes?!?!!?
SEE Unknown Subtype
6w7 sx/so
[21:29] hitta: idealism is just the gap between the thought of death
[21:29] hitta: and not dying
.
I think you're ESFp.Originally Posted by Khamelion
INTp
sx/sp
Originally Posted by ifmd95
Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, PEOPLE/WOMEN/GIRLS ARE DIFFERENT!!!
It's just too general, obviously general....
SEE Unknown Subtype
6w7 sx/so
[21:29] hitta: idealism is just the gap between the thought of death
[21:29] hitta: and not dying
.
eunice:
STFU
You are not a Se type. You are most likely not a Fi type. You are not Gamma. K?
Okay Joy that's it. I'm telling my mom she can HAVE your bloody Snickers bars from here on out.Originally Posted by Joy
Originally Posted by Logos
Retired from posting and drawing Social Security. E-mail or PM to contact.
I pity your souls
Originally Posted by Joy
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...