Edward Norton

[Beautiful sky]

I find his interviews expression of Te matters not NeTi

[Gilly]

No shit you do.

[mfckr]

.

[Creepy-cinq]

He's Ti-ESTp. He can just seem deceptively geeky, so it misleads people into thinking he's ENTp.

This makes sense. This would essentially make Maritsa INFp given that Ed is her dual.

[Beautiful sky]

He's Ti-ESTp. He can just seem deceptively geeky, so it misleads people into thinking he's ENTp.

He most certainly is not ESTp; what information would even make you say such a thing. He is ESTj...just look at every description of how Te processes info and I'm sure you can ascertain data to that effect; look and listen to the language he uses, you're good at that. He sounds just like Every ESTj quote you produced.

[mfckr]

.

[Beautiful sky]

I've never had an impression of him being very . Do you have any examples? Like interview videos or what not. To me he just always comes off like a typically Beta artfag.

Listen to his words like quotes.

He says he got into acting to meet girls...Si... pleasant sensations...he concentrates on the order in which he does things.

Ne types would likely speak about their ideas not their experiences, like as if they are writing a novel of their experience.

[mfckr]

.

[thePirate]

he just always comes off like a typically Beta artfag.

yes, because SLE give off artfag vibes

not IEI's, oh noo.

[Beautiful sky]

yes, because SLE give off artfag vibes

not IEI's, oh noo.

They don't concentrate on the order of the way the info is presented and express the information as an evolution like Norton does, they will concentrate on what they saw....Se stuff.

Key words are evolution of how events unfold, like a sequential order.

[mfckr]

.

[Beautiful sky]

I said typically Beta artfag, not typically SLE artfag. Art******ry pervades all Beta types.

I don't even know what that is.

[mfckr]

.

[Beautiful sky]

If you don't know what it is, it can't be explained. It's one of those things.

I am concentrating on the order of information that he is presenting, he does not deviate from his method even when the interviewer interrupts his pattern and where he is in his story. That's very much

[mfckr]

.

[Beautiful sky]

Examples?

From the very first question he is asked, he builds a story from a flow and order...he starts with his pilot thing and then injects Si stuff, experiences about how certain things make him feel -disoriented and whatnot, and continues on this sequential journey, never once getting distracted. You can review the video and the pattern again.

[thePirate]

I said typically Beta artfag, not typically SLE artfag. Art******ry pervades all Beta types.

what in the fuck are you talking about, this is a redundant clarification: you are still saying SLE come off as artfags as it 'pervades' beta types - I dont know what kind of betas you are meeting but I dont know one LSI or SLE I would describe in that manner

[mfckr]

.

[Beautiful sky]

Where'd you get that description? It's not bad.

It's McNew's I will send you the link tomorrow from my other computer. I'm on my Mac now and I can't do it from here.

[mfckr]

.

[thePirate]

If you're convinced enough that SLEs/LSIs are immune to being that way, then of course you're going to be oblivious to the ones that are and probably write them off as IEI or EIE.

If you're convinced enough that SLEs/LSIs can be that way, you're going to be oblivious to the ones that aren't and probably write them off as SLE/LSI when they are IEI/EIE

However, if you are so convinced, I would ask you to show some examples of these mythical fag SLE.

[mfckr]

.

[Beautiful sky]

Nah. They're separable by looking at temperament. For instance, Ed Norton is obviously EP>IP.



As soon as I get done loling at that line.

Why don't you watch some other interviews before you even suggest such a ridiculous conclusion...he is ESTj, very obviously so, with every regard...and my dual.

He looks like one of our forum members too, not you, but I'm not saying who.

[Creepy-cinq]

Nah. They're separable by looking at temperament. For instance, Ed Norton is obviously EP>IP.

As soon as I get done loling at that line.

Thank 'god'. Some sanity on this forum.

[stanprollyright]

I would ask you to show some examples of these mythical fag SLE.

JWC3 = SLE theatre major who loves chick flicks

[thePirate]

Ed Norton being EP, I dont know about that.

4w3 Fe subtype can seem EP.

SLE doesnt cut it as a typing for me right now, although I suppose its possible

An analysis fleshing this out would be interesting

JWC3 = SLE theatre major who loves chick flicks

I would rather not take forum members as examples, they can be mistyped - but also having a preference for those things doesnt means he exhibits such a vibe.

[stanprollyright]

SLE doesnt cut it as a typing for me right now, although I suppose its possible

Me neither, he seems really intuitive to me.

I would rather not take forum members as examples, they can be mistyped - but also having a preference for those things doesnt means he exhibits such a vibe.

I was pretty much just calling him a fag...

[Gilly]

He's Ti-ESTp. He can just seem deceptively geeky, so it misleads people into thinking he's ENTp.

I dunno, I think it runs deeper than superficial "geekiness;" I wasn't totally convinced by the AHX character. He never quite went far enough. Stacy Keach was an Ni-EIE playing an Ni-EIE; Norton never really seemed to fully mesh with him in their interactions, Keach was a bit more into it, but Norton was just an edge off, just not quite there enough. Perfect for the Fight Club character, who was obviously supposed to be intuitive, probably IEI; not so much the full effect necessary for the SLE-Ti pitbull charismatic lieutenant.

[Gilly]

Perky little fuck.





Just too hazy, doesn't carry himself like an SLE; no terse physical composure, just sort of casual slouch, neck forward, a bit misty-eyed...Not quite as much of a pampered brat as Pitt but a pretty typical-looking ILE, IMO.

[Gilly]

This interview is a clincher for me. Listen to him talking about getting in character right at the beginning: pure Si+Fe.

[Gilly]

Has anyone considered ILI?

Fuck no.

[Suz]

Edward Norton is my dual.

He may be your dual all right, but he's not LSE.

This makes sense. This would essentially make Maritsa INFp given that Ed is her dual.

My thoughts EXACTLY Nik. But i sort of agree with Gillys last statemnt of him being Si+Fe.

[1981slater]

ILE Ti

[Gilly]

My thoughts EXACTLY Nik. But i sort of agree with Gillys last statemnt of him being Si+Fe.

I was NOT saying that he is SiFe; I was saying he was talking about Si+Fe, implying that he valued the functions. He is clearly ILE, IMO; I don't really see why one would consider SEI.

[Suz]

I was NOT saying that he is SiFe; I was saying he was talking about Si+Fe, implying that he valued the functions. He is clearly ILE, IMO; I don't really see why one would consider SEI.

Oh i know, thats what i meant too, sorry i was tired when i wrote that.

[Marie84]

ILE Ti

I think so too.

not sure where people are getting Se ego from, he has a rather unassertive, dormant, demeanor

[Marie84]

I said typically Beta artfag, not typically SLE artfag. Art******ry pervades all Beta types.

Grouping Betas as common "art fags" and labeling people so easily as such is too subjective to be used to type people. By these standards we can say any person who works in the arts, and takes their work seriously, is a Beta, which is far from the truth

Even if it were true, pragmatic types are generally the least likely to fit into that stereotype

[717495]

Edward Norton - SEE artfag subtype

Grouping Betas as common "art fags" and labeling people so easily as such is too subjective to be used to type people.

It's artfags not "art fags."

[Gilly]

I said typically Beta artfag, not typically SLE artfag. Art******ry pervades all Beta types.

lol it's kind of true.

But it's also what makes us way fucking cooler than Gammas. You guys can be boring as sin.

[mfckr]

.