And I would disagree with Gulenko.

I could never imagine being a woman's boy-toy just because she's filthy rich. Maybe for the sex, and of course the love, but not the money. It's degrading and irresponsible.

Anyway, I have no doubt that part of Gulenko's description is aimed rathely decidedly at late-20th century Russian female representatives of these types. People seem to forget the culture gap when dealing with these (relatively old) Russian descriptions. Gender expectations in Russia were (and still are) quite different from those here in the West, not to mention the economic make-up of the society. I expect most INFps (female and male alike) would probably be just slightly offended.