Removed at User Request
Removed at User Request
Removed at User Request
I hardly see why questioning your type can be classed as trolling, why, you see, as you question peoples types all the time, and you keep doing it even if they ask you to stop.
Why, you've even been typing me as IEE for a while now, mentioning it at places along with some untruthful slander. I even asked you once to explain why you type me as IEE, and you told me that you're not explaining it and I should just accept it because you said so
Surely YOU can't think re-typing someone is trolling, unless you yourself think you are a troll. Yet you don't think you're a troll, how could this be?
Removed at User Request
Dude, I've never been banned, I already said maybe you are getting me confused with someone else.
You even said to me earlier about me having problems with my social life. I don't have problems with my social life and I've never said I have.
Dude, all these things you are saying about me don't exist .... you're a deluded fuck, fact.
So you're accusing me of trolling when you don't even know if you think you are being trolled? Just stfu, or don't if you are too stupid not to see the non-point in trying to endlessly twist semantics around like it's going to be useful or something. Sigh I don't know what's the most ridicilous, you, or me for replying to you.
Removed at User Request
OK... You see no problems with me questioning your type, you see no problems with w/e way I address you, as you've said my pms not an issue and you've previously said something along the lines that you don't understand or see the problem in how people are addressed.
So why bring a private conversation to the forum? You're incorrigible.
Removed at User Request
I've already pointed out things you've said about me which are wrong, and here you keep on going conducting a massive story about me which has zero basis in reality. If you knew me irl, I'm nothing like the delusions you conduct about me.
And this is one of your problems, you come with things about people that have no basis in reality then using that convince yourself about the person and their type.
People that do that are ime dangerous. Anyway, I know you'd argue till the cows come home on here, there's no end to your fantasies.
Removed at User Request
You've no intention of discussing your type, you just listed a couple of quotes I said to do your usual jumbling act, why not stop being a lying bastard.
And lol at u trying to dissecting your own words you passive aggressive, fantasising bullshitter, why not try the letters next time.
CANT WE ALL JUST GET ALONG
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is and not
I sense a little discord between pinocchio and cyclops :frown:
Perhaps an Fi-POLR hitting Fi-HA phenomenon? And then Fe-POLR hitting Fe-HA back? Equals insults all around!
let's all now
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Removed at User Request
The truth is everyone thinks you are every type. It's completely sexy and theoretical. Embrace it.
Don't worry, he's one last bit of entertainment before I put him on ignore, as anyone should.
tbh I couldn't give a flying fuck about your type, I'm just amazed at how stupid you are that when you have your own behavior put back at you you think it's stupid but you can't see it's stupidity when you do it yourself.
BTW I do hope you feel better from your projections here, you are quite doolally.
Wake up and see the shit you talk, you'll probably end up using the same jibberish to type Dynamicism as ESI, oh wait you did.No no no, sneaky little one, not so fast. I agree but with one condition: no Fi-HA and no Fe-PoLR. This strong clash looks rather like Fi-PoLR and Fi, don't you think? As long as you're so skilful to make us happy by blending things, maybe you manage to blend some Ti-PoLR and Te-HA in, to make us all happy. Sounds like Christmas
^The delusions destroyer.We will, don't worry, Cyclops has periods .
Removed at User Request
Nah, it's you that still doesn't get it. You construct bullshit stories in your head then intentionally back it up by twisting what people say. You do it to me, you do it to vero, to natasha, heck you even do it when its not about someones type.
What I done is called you an ILI, backed it up with inter-type relations, ie you see natasha as your identical, you see Vero as your contrary. Hell I could even pull off more of you're stunts and twist what you're saying by pointing out that all these weird and wonderful stories that you come out with is your Ni dominant. I could also say that what sort of E spends their entire life sitting posting on a forum. I could then say I know plenty ILIs who behave exactly like you do then ad-hominly dismiss anything you say to the contrary. Hell for all I know I might even be right and you really are ILI, don't think there's no smoke without fire in my suggestion.
And really, your arrogant and insulting attitude, don't go making the mistake that's ILE, just look at user Niffweed.
Removed at User Request
Cyclops is, being honest, among the most unintelligent forum members we have on this website.
You don't do it to everyone.
Now I feel you are being conflict creating by trying to ignore what I say with changing the subject to undermine me.Did you read the horoscope for today?
I never once said that ILI = arrogant and insults people. I find that your jibes are unhelpful and that you just want to feed conflict.The big difference between me and Niff is that I never take on someone out of the void like he does, at least he did that to me, I'm not fond of other deeds of him. Nevertheless, you mean that this type, ILI, is arrogant and insults people? Good to know.
If you have actual reasons for me being IEE then I ask you again to state them.
I admit that my approach with you hasn't been the best. It simply becomes offensive to read you stating my type like its fact, slipping it into conversations with other people and not just explaining your reasons.
I also ask that if I do not agree with IEE once you've presented your reasons that if you must state my type that you state, imo cyclops is IEE. Not stating cyclops is IEE.
I accept that my method of showing you how I view you as unreasonable, I'm willing and I will stop it, but in return I ask you to not be so passively provoking yourself, or twist the semantics of mines or others words, which is what you do when you decide to find a 'target'.
Last edited by Cyclops; 06-27-2010 at 10:15 AM.
We need more ILI's, Pinocchio. Glad you understand that.
Also Pinocchio, please directly consult the issue, rather than answer by mocking me for not providing you with photos. It's your claim and you should be able to elaborate on it yourself.
I feel vaguely insulted by the implication that the clear hurt Fe-HA resulting in Se-role in super-ego defense coupled with Fi-PoLR misjudgments rationalized by Ti-creative that are demonstrated in this thread are being associated with my type.
That being said, I totally agree with many issues you bring up, seeing as almost everyone Pinocchio types as ILI isn't one (Krig, Vero), while many people he types otherwise (aixel, Jarno, if I recall correctly, now nanashi) probably are. Makes me wonder if I'm mistyped, lol.
I've also had my doubts about Pinocchio's self-typing initially - as probably nearly everyone who is familiar with ILE-Ne more than Ti sub - but I think now he's probably one, if not - fortunately - a typical representative of the type.
Removed at User Request
I apologies for associating him with your type. Perhaps you could look for an improvement and look to do a swap with beta for ****** instead of him.
Maybe it's IEI not ILI then. J/K on the account of IEI being the miss-fit dump.
To use the word again there must be a previous, you've never explained it.
Must you always play games? You make noises about typing people correctly and that the information must be available on the forum and you are only interested in reasons. Instead you look to support it by evidence you don't have and either will not or cannot provide anything from here to support your claim.What issue?
You are a fraud and you cannot even abide by your own words. This makes you a liar.
You cannot offer anything, and you evade evade.
There is nothing from you but evil.
I don't see any truths, one of the main things I recall is you displaying your delusions.To be sincere, I don't think it's all about type/subtype in my case. I know some calm Ti-ILEs, a bit deluded, I mean not so clenchy about telling the truth to people. Maybe in my case, it has to do with two things:
- I deal with people and their type/personality/nature - but most ILEs aren't in this situation
- I got in touch, in my 20s, with a buddhist-derived teaching which made me realize for the first time how many prejudices we have and how subjectively and distorted we see reality.
Anyway, reading some ILE descriptions, it appears that any ILE has this grim truth defensive mode latent in them. Maybe it's all a matter of circumstances?
It feels good here in Gamma, I'm staying with you
Anyway, as you don't provide reasons for your typing of me, I conclude any further conversation on the matter complete. You're a frustrating liar with delusions and I can't process such a thing.
I'll reserve the right to treat you as I please, treat you like you treat others.
Last edited by Cyclops; 06-27-2010 at 03:17 PM.
Removed at User Request
You can't even follow a conversation. You answered most of my points in a way that didn't follow the conversation: you started talking about something else.
You are too busy assuming everything evolves round you.
I am an Fi type.Fi. Especially because you generalize, one can either be totally evil or totally good. Fi types tend to see in absolute terms like this, you don't just "tend to" you are seeing things like this => you are an Fi type. Yet another proof which you ignore, deny, then later say that no one demonstrated that you're an Fi type. They did, you just live in denial. They did, you just live in denial. Quote: Originallyything evolves round you.
However, Gillys previously described you as evil, you'll enjoy trying to filter that into your embarrassingly simple bullshit, as it involves you.
Removed at User Request
Removed at User Request