Okay, but that's one perspective. An intellectual perspective. Examples of functions and information elements are much simpler in day to day life though.
Step away from the keyboard!
Okay, but that's one perspective. An intellectual perspective. Examples of functions and information elements are much simpler in day to day life though.
Step away from the keyboard!
(and this is still Ti)
Of course it's an intellectual perspective, that's implicit in the structure of the OP. Why do you want to "play the sensor" is beyond me.Originally Posted by Joy
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
It's not a matter of "playing the sensor". It's a matter of living life. And not over-analyzing, missing the forest for the trees.
I agree with others, this sounds totally static and missing the point of dynamics. Personally, I find "focus on constant aspects of reality" and "focus on changeable aspects of reality" infinitely more useful than usual image vs movie analogy. Or otherwise, I could describe statics as "objects' qualities and how they relate to each other", and dynamics as "objects' actions and interactions". I stand by subjectivity/objectivity - described as individual viewpoint vs unifying viewpoints to create a viewpoint-independent image - going with introversion/extraversion (field/object), and also qualitative/quantitative.
I disagree with example of "Te", by the way. Te isn't classification of objects. Te is explicit actions of objects, which usually relates to how useful something is (for a given purpose).
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote