Detecting Socionic Types
Okay, it's probably more of a flowchart than a test but I thought I'd share anyway.
Detecting Socionic Types
Okay, it's probably more of a flowchart than a test but I thought I'd share anyway.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
I love Socioniko, it's a wonderful site.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I don't really like this test. Going by it, I'm guessing it has me as somewhat INTj-ish and INTp-ish. The best test will ask questions solely about information elements and their positions (think dominant, PoLR, HA, DS, and creative mostly) and some few questions for overall quadra values. No V.I., temperaments or dichotomies involved (except for those dichotomies that distinguish the quadras in a relevant manner.)
I kind of like the main idea of the first two steps of this chart, but the third step had me all confused and probably wasn't a necessary set-up in the first place.
"However, we do not approve using it for self-identification."
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
If I followed this chart, I think I'd come to INTj.
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
This uses too many personality traits that can be easily shared between types. And, of course, it's predictable. Something tells me you can't really test type where people choose traits about themselves, if testing is even viable at all.
This test is really weird.
EDIT: On second thought I think it is possible to determine one's type using this test. Sadly, it will take a bit of time.
Last edited by Absurd; 04-18-2010 at 05:55 PM.