This does not have an effect on my self-typing; I am just curious what people think.
Thanks.
ESI
LSI
Other (please say which)
This does not have an effect on my self-typing; I am just curious what people think.
Thanks.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Heh, well I dunno. From reading your posts, I like you. You seem like a decently chill and funny guy. Your sense of humor generally falls out of what I would consider the Fi/Te realm to say the least.
You also appear to like confrontation around here but don't take it seriously, and also have an awareness of power dynamics. you type yourself as LSI? but I think there's a decent possibility that you could be SLE. You kind of remind me of mercutio, the posts I have read from you have generally been concise and edgey. They also don't have the feel of an LSI for the most part. It would be really easy for me to picture you going out breaking rules just for the fuck of it as opposed to abiding by them.
Admittedly, I only recently noticed you around the forum and don't know much about your posting history so as it stands my analysis is abit superficial.
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is and not
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Removed at User Request
Not sure. There is evidence for both "subjective sentiments" held very closely and firmly, and for "systematic logic".
You do remind me of some ESIs I know somewhat. Actually rather a lot after I think about it.
But you could very well be LSI too. You are pretty darn logical.
Are you sure you're an introvert?
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
You have ESI humor, but I don't know how the stereotypical ESI behaves on a forum or their writing pattern if there is any. So I cannot have a strong opinion about your type, but voted for ESI.
I have sort of a love/hate thing with rules, but I don't break them just because I feel like it. Rather, I ignore rules that I think are stupid as long as I think I won't get in trouble. Otherwise, I follow rules pretty much 100%.
Sometimes I can be very loud and talkative, but it's usually only for attention or when I feel like arguing. Otherwise I keep to myself. I also do not initiate friendships or relationships. I always wait for the other person to signal that they are interested.
What do you define as ESI humor?
By the way, as long as we're talking about humor, my sense of humor is extremely eccentric, and I've never encountered anyone who shares it exactly. Khamelion and Gilly are the two who come closest. Joy doesn't get the more off-the-wall stuff.
I tend to see humor in very random things, like sitting in a chair and staring at a carpet.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
ENTp:
You have ENTp humor, and at the very least it is MERRY.
The end is nigh
Either ESI or LSI. You do remind me of my brother a lot. But that could be an Ne polr thing rather than an identical thing.
Hmm well I accidentally voted "other" because I thought it said "either". I should wear my glasses at the computer. Sorry. I guess I'd give an edge to ESI but I don't know exactly why so I wouldn't put too much stock in that.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
I think you react positively to Fe and general silliness (on occasion), but maybe I just assume everyone does...
The saddest ESFj
...
I've seen a picture of you, and you VI just like me.