You seem like the really quiet and emotionally subdued type?
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
I would guess EII as well. You give an impression of fragility that I don't think would get along well with the Se-valuing Quadras. Your gaze seems distant and unfocused, leading me to believe you are an Inuitive type. Since you're clearly introverted, that leaves EII and LII, and you don't seem as cold and "hard" as an LII. Which leaves EII.
Quaero Veritas.
Introversion is clear... The rest is hard to say...
My guess is ILI.
EII
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
A typical IEI.
Yeah, I'd go EII > ILI.
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
IEI
Thanks everyone! :-)
What can I say? Now I think I'm EII...but maybe I'm IEI...don't know...or maybe I'm logical?..
My first thought was LII.
Keep in mind I know nothing of VI. It's really just a first thought.
Fe/Ti introvert, not LSI.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
So IEI?Fe/Ti introvert, not LSI.
or LII or SEI
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
You have the eyes of male H-ILIs I know. Unfortunately I don't know any femal H-ILIs personally. (H-ILI means harmonizing subtype ins the DCNH subtype system)
Looks like quite a few people's VI database are out-of-date/perpetually wrong.
According to my VI database, which is possibly out-of-date and perpetually wrong, I would say that you are EII. You would love to be logical type, but you aren't.
If you are, then I am wrong.
If I'm wrong, then almost everyone else is right, with regards to Fe in ego, or at least Fe valuing. If they are right, then I would say IEI has the highest chance of being right. This still doesn't place you as a logical type.
If I am absolutely wrong, then you are ILI. So you'll be a logical type only if I'm absolutely wrong.
Or, if you detected the logical error in the statement prior to this one.
She is wiseWhy I love LSEs:
beyond words
beautiful within
her soul
brighter than
the sun
lovelier than
love
dreams larger
than life
and does not
understand the
meaning of no.
Because everything
through her, and in her, is
"Yes, it will be done."
Originally Posted by Abbie
I definitely think LII. I really love the second picture (::
D-SEI 9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
i see herzy, then she wos 14, i believe.
i would call that facial/physical structure - "australian phattie girly type"
kinda, get into play
i had interacted with one chick who was from australia, and all that, and that kinda "sticks together" with the that image, probably could say ESTp image
well, but not exactly with the girl in the pictures, ofcourse... I mean i doubt she's ESTp
Removed at User Request
Maybe I could answer questions to undestand who am I exactly??
Removed at User Request
Removed at User Request
I don't think I can be a sensor...
Marista, I seriously can't tell if you're using MBTI terminology to describe socionics, as you are capitalizing your j's and p's. Please be careful in the future.
In the meantime, my initial reaction to garance was INFj.
"S" means a good contact with material world, things, body sensations, and i.e. I'm not so good in such things. Sometimes I even can't tell if an item is good or not, does something suits me or not. I'm awfully clumsy, I can break something without understanding how it happened. I always have a big disorder in my things...Well, that's like that...What do you mean you can't be a sensor? what do you think a sensor is?
Last edited by garance; 01-23-2010 at 10:56 AM.
Actually, the thing I'd like to find out is am I really F or am I T? Got some doubts...
Sounds stereotypically Ne ego to me lol
Types with Se or Si egos are generally associated with the 'here and now' because their primary mode of information input comes directly from the observable world: Se from the physical locations of objects (or so I'm told), Si from the interactions between objects (or so I'm told).