I thought you saw the "cognitive functions" as objective cognitive processes therein negating any interpretation that doesn't categorise people with differing information styles as the same type.
I'm guessing you are not a fan of DCNH right?
Anyway I don't know how you may want to put it but on Jung, key facts are that he's got a distorted view of phenomena and his "logic" is difficult to follow. That's being generous - he just waddles and after years of studying psychological types. It slowly emerges that it's a mess of impressions.
ON TRUMP
If you go by the Gulenko models, it's apparent SEE makes total sense for Trump, he's ultra inconsistent and like the Politician - says whatever he thinks people want to hear with hyperbole and no shame. He's very emotional - 4D ethics of emotions and he runs wild with people skills. Ethical men can be very aggressive and domineering, unlike MBTI were the harmonising subtype is that ethics means for them.
https://youtu.be/5UQyz5W11gg
https://youtu.be/5UQyz5W11gg
As for schools out there, I get the impression people are clear out for fame, but I personally don't care and instead hope there's a sage out there who can rescue socionics from its pseudoscience chasm. That's because tragically I see the theory as composed of half truths and full of inconsistencies. I'm not happy with schools out there, they can't fix socionics and a little group politics is preventing progress since personality cults litter some schools. East or West the same problems exist.