copying this idea because its cool. and because i'm sort of open to the idea of considering other types for the first time in a long time (although, in all fairness, that could change in 10 minutes for all i know). and because i'm just curious.
Ne
Ni
Fe
Fi
Te
Ti
Se
Si
What's obvious to me is that you value. Have you considered LIE perchance?
wow, thats an interesting suggestion, and probably my favorite ever, hah. LIE has never crossed my mind. when i made this thread, the other types that were floating around in my head as most worth considering were LII, SEI, and IEE. i remember teliing someone at one point that the only types that would surprise me to be put out for me would be any Se ego or Ej temperament types..but now you're the second person to bring up an Ej type as a possibility, which is interesting. i'm curious how you might see me as Te ego (you said its obvious i'm Fi valuing, and the idea of being Fi-seeking isn't nearly as strange to me as the idea of being Te ego, even if they're the same thing.) i want to be open-minded, but tbh the idea of LIE really threw me.Originally Posted by thehotelambush
What's obvious to me is that you value
thanks for replying.
wow, thats an interesting suggestion, and probably my favorite ever, hah. LIE has never crossed my mind. when i made this thread, the other types that were floating around in my head as most worth considering were LII, SEI, and IEE. i remember teliing someone at one point that the only types that would surprise me to be put out for me would be any Se ego or Ej temperament types..but now you're the second person to bring up an Ej type as a possibility, which is interesting. i'm curious how you might see me as Te ego (you said its obvious i'm Fi valuing, and the idea of being Fi-seeking isn't nearly as strange to me as the idea of being Te ego, even if they're the same thing.) i want to be open-minded, but tbh the idea of LIE really threw me.
thanks for replying.
ya, things like, uh, that, are not at all uncommon for me. (context for others: being paranoid that i've offended someone and being stupidly overapologetic, or at least thats my view of it.) i haven't known whether it was attributable to type, and if so, how (Fi seeking seems like a reasonable suggestion) or if it its just because i'm a neurotic bastard lol. it was actually a wondering if i'm really good at Fi or not that led me to consider LII.
Yeah, if you're going to consider a logical type I would guess maybe LIE or ILI. You actually remind me of implied in some ways.
Awwwwthis makes me think you value
I gotta go with EII for you
I can see an argument for both Fi and Ne, almost equally, but you have a calm salinity to your posts that seems more common in Fi base>Ne
anywho, that's my impression so far
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
I can see an argument for both Fi and Ne, almost equally, but you have a calm salinity to your posts that seems more common in Fi base>Ne
anywho, that's my impression so far
Yes, I think EII. Strong Ne subtype.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
I would check to see why you feel that way. I experience the same thing, but I honestly believe it is not type-related for me; because I was not always like that (actually a bit insensitive in that regard), and I can pinpoint what event may have caused it.
Johari/Nohari
"Tell someone you love them today, because life is short; shout it at them in German, because life is also terrifying."
Fruit, the fluffy kitty.
You just observe things here and you don't make any abstractions...I'm sorry I don't eve type you as EII; I think you're just here to get support for a type you think you are and you've chosen for yourself...hence, that makes you SEE type.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
thanks.
i'm not sure what you mean by making abstractions versus observing and how you see this in me. my motives in making this thread were, tbh, partly out of boredom and attention-seeking but i was not motivated at ALL by trying to prove my self-typing because very few people have questioned it so i have little reason to defend anything. i think its really interesting to hear other opinions about my type even if they seem strange to me and i'm willing to consider alternatives (especially the ones i listed previously in this thread). i don't expect you to buy that i'm EII just because that's my self-typing, but there are far better options imo than SEE, which i think is a totally ridiculous idea and one of the few types i think can be just plain ruled out.
Back off before it gets too late.
I've seen people of a quadrillion types do this. How does the first part of that sentence have diddly to do with the second part?
Salinity as in salt cube-ness?I can see an argument for both Fi and Ne, almost equally, but you have a calm salinity to your posts that seems more common in Fi base>Ne
anywho, that's my impression so far
Or did you maybe mean "serenity" ?
Your strongest function is asking people what type they think you are.
I admire your perseverance.i've held out for awhile
I haven't really paid too much attention to give you evidence for another typing, but I always thought you presented a very different vibe than the other EIIs on the forum.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
