View Poll Results: What is Mountain Dew's type?

Voters
33. You may not vote on this poll
  • INTj

    1 3.03%
  • ESFj

    9 27.27%
  • ENTp

    5 15.15%
  • ISFp

    0 0%
  • ISTj

    1 3.03%
  • ENFj

    1 3.03%
  • ESTp

    15 45.45%
  • INFp

    1 3.03%
  • INTp

    0 0%
  • ESFp

    5 15.15%
  • ENTj

    0 0%
  • ISFj

    0 0%
  • ISTp

    0 0%
  • ENFp

    4 12.12%
  • ESTj

    3 9.09%
  • INFj

    0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 121 to 160 of 271

Thread: Mountain Dew's Type

  1. #121
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Dew View Post
    Lol. Do you have any evidence to back up that claim?

    Here, I'll play the same game:

    Maritsa33, you're ESTj, because your Fe is role and interchangable with your Te.

    LSE are quite capable of excitement, enthusiasm and taking part in Fe atmosphere, but they always resort back to Te and Si and aren't very good at doing Fe joking.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  2. #122
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Dew View Post
    You're doing selective reading (common with subjective introverts). I want you to read the excerpt about Role function I just placed here.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  3. #123
    Creepy-Snaps

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    You're doing selective reading (common with subjective introverts). I want you to read the excerpt about Role function I just placed here.
    Lmao. I read it. It just further proves you can't be using your Ti as a role function, ironically giving me all these examples to point out the differences:

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    Role function
    When a person is actively using his base function, the role function is essentially turned off. The two cannot both be "on" at the same time, because they represent two opposing approaches to similar things.
    Which still brings me back to my point:

    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Dew View Post
    Really? Cause I was under the impression, when someone was on the defensive, under attack, that they are much more comfortable and confident defending their Ego functions, as opposed to their Super-Ego role function, which is both weak and unvalued. That's amazing how you decide to defend your 3RD FUNCTION and not your EGO FUNCTIONS.

    Ti-valued.
    You already admitted you were using Ti. It doesn't make sense for you to continually fall back on it, like you are doing now, if it were a Role function.

  4. #124
    Creepy-Snaps

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    (common with subjective introverts).
    I'm anything but subjective. I like getting things out in the open. I like concrete. I like examples.

  5. #125
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    SEE because she's to melancholic and complains too much to be EII; she's too down. And is attracted to getting into low level spats with people...an example of that SeFi activity.
    I find Marie to be a really pleasantly calm and even-tempered individual, actually.

    Anyway, either way, she's a Serious type. Something you'll notice she does not do (nor do any Serious types (off the top of my head)), which is also something you do very frequently, is make references to the system of Socionics. All the time, you will talk about "This is my Role Ti", "This is my base Fi", "This is FiNe behind this action", etc, etc. That pattern of referring back to a system of thought frequently to explain what's happening is rather distinctively Merry, as far as I've seen.

    Just an observation, take it as you will

    As a disclaimer, I don't have any opinion on your type whatsoever. I'm just saying what I see, without arguing one way or another for or against EII, EIE, or any other type.

  6. #126
    Creepy-Snaps

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Egbert Human View Post
    I find Marie to be a really pleasantly calm and even-tempered individual, actually.

    Anyway, either way, she's a Serious type. Something you'll notice she does not do (nor do any Serious types (off the top of my head)), which is also something you do very frequently, is make references to the system of Socionics. All the time, you will talk about "This is my Role Ti", "This is my base Fi", "This is FiNe behind this action", etc, etc. That pattern of referring back to a system of thought frequently to explain what's happening is rather distinctively Merry, as far as I've seen.

    Just an observation, take it as you will

    As a disclaimer, I don't have any opinion on your type whatsoever. I'm just saying what I see, without arguing one way or another for or against EII, EIE, or any other type.
    Thank you! (Even though I know you're impartial, not taking sides) That's what I'm talking about...

    Looks like she left for now. No response in 20 minutes. We must've worn her out with our strong Se hitting her POLR.

    She's probably taking a break right now, thinking we need to read more.

  7. #127
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Well, taking jabs at Maritsa here like that certainly won't coax her back.

    EDIT

    Not trying to be bitchy. I'm just really not interested in taking sides here, or worse... having it decided for me that I'm on one side or another.

  8. #128
    Creepy-Snaps

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Egbert Human View Post
    Well, taking jabs at Maritsa here like that certainly won't coax her back.
    Exactly.

  9. #129
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Egbert Human View Post
    I find Marie to be a really pleasantly calm and even-tempered individual, actually.

    Anyway, either way, she's a Serious type. Something you'll notice she does not do (nor do any Serious types (off the top of my head)), which is also something you do very frequently, is make references to the system of Socionics. All the time, you will talk about "This is my Role Ti", "This is my base Fi", "This is FiNe behind this action", etc, etc. That pattern of referring back to a system of thought frequently to explain what's happening is rather distinctively Merry, as far as I've seen.

    Just an observation, take it as you will

    As a disclaimer, I don't have any opinion on your type whatsoever. I'm just saying what I see, without arguing one way or another for or against EII, EIE, or any other type.
    I reference to a function because EII are teachers, because I'm being introspective about the situation (that is being analytical and introverted); it's a way of me looking at myself, like holding up a mirror to myself. The same introverted way that MD does in his video when he stops to make a reference to himself. This is related Introvertion (either Ti or Fi). Because Marie doesn't do this, I can tell she's not an introvert.

    MD,
    You sound like Christopher Reeve. If you listen to an interview of him on youtube with your eyes closed you'll see how similar your voices are.
    Last edited by Beautiful sky; 02-17-2011 at 06:18 AM.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  10. #130
    Creepy-Snaps

    Default

    I'd like to freely write. Like a journal, almost. Disregarding everything in this thread so far. I'm not arguing now about my being SLE. I'm simply making observations about myself. I'll let you guys play connect-the-dots and see which type this fits best.

    I despise routine. I don't like vaccuuming the house once a week, if it's not dirty. That's inefficient. I prefer a case-by-case basis. I don't like shoveling snow in the driveway, if it's only 2 inches, and it's all going to melt by the afternoon anyway. No point shoveling 'just to be on the safe side' or 'just because that's what we always do' if there's no point in shoveling.

    I sometimes fail to see the point of cleaning in general. It's going to get dirty anyway, isn't it? Now, of course, I have excellent hygiene, and won't let my environment deteroriate to grotesque conditions. In university, I was the cleanest of my roommates; and I always cleaned up my dishes, took out the trash, kept my stuff clean where it interfered with other people. I let my own room get messy, no point if it didn't affect other people's getting things done, and it didn't bother me.

    But there's something about the regular, monotony of cleaning, which bothers me. Having something set in stone bothers me. I understand, over the course of human lives, developing routines that you can do makes life easier, without having to think things through, every time. But if you're smart enough, and you can think things through... why not make an exception? Let me give an example:

    I remember when I was learning to drive. My Dad was riding in the passenger seat, guiding me, giving pointers, etc. On one of the regular roads going home, traffic was backed up ridiculously far; we would have to wait probably 15 minutes, not moving, if we stayed on the same road. I look to the side, to the parking lot of a diner I know, and decide I could use that and turn around, and take the shortcut I know, and it'd be only 5 minutes or less. Saving us a lot of time.

    I look and see I can turn on the grass, go down the hill a bit off the road, to get to the parking lot, and turn around. The coast was clear. I make the decision, and I go. I turn off the road onto the grass. This freaks out my Dad! He instantly panicks, cause I hadn't checked with him, or mentioned what I had considered in my head, but I just thought about it for a few seconds and went. Instantly.

    The next few minutes were filled with lectures about how it's safer to stay on the road, I could've hit a telephone pole or something, or rock, or anything. I argue back that I checked, and I knew where I was going, and it was ok. I don't see the point in having rules or routine, if you can see and think for yourself, and it's ok. I sometimes prefer intellect over time-tested wisdom. That is, if the time-tested wisdom restricts freedom from doing what's right.

    Ultimately my Dad saw my point. It saved us time. And we were ok. So it was ok.

    To contrast myself to my Dad in a different light. This time, an example where I'm trying to plan something out, which I think is important, and he'd prefer just to handle the problem unless it comes up:

    My senior year of university, in deciding to be the "leader" of my roommates in a sense, and take care of paying the bills, have that responsibility, a big concern dawned on me: how can I make my roommates pay me back? What power do I have over them? If they simply refuse to pay me, and I have to pay the bills since they're in my name, do I have any legal power against them?

    My Dad didn't think this was a big issue. He'd rather just deal with it as the problem arises. He told me my roommates could easily pay me, and it'd be no big deal. I don't know if they'd be deadbeats. I told him they could be, and I'd need to figure out a way to make sure I get paid, that I have that power, or something to fall back on, just in case. Something to consider.

    Also, in general, going back to the cleaning/monotony, I do really bad in jobs where everything is regular/routine. I need a fast-paced job in order to stay interested. To stay excited. To keep figuring things out. To keep learning. If it's not interesting to me, I ultimately get really bored, and move on.

    I like thinking. I like figuring things out. Thinking on my feet. If I don't keep going, or doing something, I get bored. And I want to figure things out to be the best. Perfectionist, completionist. I've had a fair amount of 'flings' in my life, done lots of extracurricular activities in school, sports, etc. I get really bored if I'm sitting at home doing nothing. I get really down on myself, depressed. I'm much happier and positive if I'm busy, working, out with friends, etc. And have more energy overall.

    Does any of this fit SLE? Or simply Ep temperament? Or something else? I don't know, just random insights into myself. Routine is overrated.

  11. #131
    Creepy-Snaps

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hayley View Post
    I enjoyed watching your video almost as much as I have enjoyed hearing your occasional singing, rapping and finger clicking .

    I struggle with typing you from VI but overall I can't help but see you as being similar to the actor Colin Firth. He seems to have a similar jaw/mouth to yourself which I think is one of your more distinct facial features therefor somewhat useful for typing purposes. I personally have no idea as to Colin Firth's type though I have seen others suggest SLI, SLE, IEI and LII.
    Michael J Fox also has a slightly similar jaw/mouth and I think he has been typed by some as IEE.

    I look forward to seeing more Mountain Dew videos some time soon .
    Thank you Hayley!

    You-know-who told me that you had heard me singing from before. And finger-clicking too? And you've heard my rapping?

    Maybe I should put some of my videos of singing/rapping/finger-snapping on Youtube for everyone here, lmao.

    And I think Colin Firth does seem similar to me, how I would smile/express myself. Not sure if it's exactly the same. But in general, just very positive/open/happy, a warm smile.

    And I'll get to making more videos. Glad you enjoyed the first.

  12. #132
    Creepy-Snaps

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    I reference to a function because EII are teachers, because I'm being introspective about the situation (that is being analytical and introverted); it's a way of me looking at myself, like holding up a mirror to myself. The same introverted way that MD does in his video when he stops to make a reference to himself. This is related Introvertion (either Ti or Fi). Because Marie doesn't do this, I can tell she's not an introvert.

    MD,
    You sound like Christopher Reeve. If you listen to an interview of him on youtube with your eyes closed you'll see how similar your voices are.
    Mmm I think all types are capable of introspection though, to some degree. Isn't that why we're all here? Understanding ourselves and our relationships with others better?

    I'm listening to a video of Christopher Reeve right now. He does seem pretty composed/professional. Slower speaking than me, though. But I'm watching a video of him when he's older. Maybe my speaking would slow down a bit too someday. And I'll be a story-teller when I'm older too lol. "BACK IN MY DAY..."

    But I take that as a complement. Christopher Reeve was a class-act. I'll have to listen to more videos in the future.

  13. #133
    Creepy-Snaps

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FDG View Post
    It seems like you can do almost everything uncannily well, from your own descriptions of yourself. Perhaps you trascend any human psychological type.
    Hmm. You seemed to have missed it when I pointed out a few of my weaknesses:

    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Dew View Post
    I do have trouble on the internet here, telling if people are joking and not with text.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Dew View Post
    Yeah. HA to be loved... I tend to hate being disliked... try really hard to be friendly with everyone... apologize afterwards... have a hard time breaking off bad relationships (one reason I think I'm not Fi creative or SEE by the way, since SEEs seem to break off bad relations with ease)... =\ But yeah, I do think perhaps that's why I use lots of smilies.
    But that's ok. I appreciate the flattery to my ego, albeit done sarcastically. I'm just so awesome, it doesn't seem like I have many weaknesses, does it? (yuck lol... )

    I think you're awesome too!

  14. #134
    Creepy-Snaps

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eunice View Post
    MD, I like reading your posts so far as they are down to earth and straightforward. Your writing style does not seem to suggest that you are a Beta type. I'm thinking of Alpha NT, rational > irrational.
    Another post I had missed a few days ago and hadn't responded to.

    Thank you! I think writing/communicating is very important, and have spent years trying to improve my writing. It was very satisfying and rewarding, having a way to express myself.

    I'm still unsure what exactly my writing style is... in terms of Gulenko's forms of thinking. But Alpha NT is entirely still a possibility!

    And thanks again.

  15. #135
    Creepy-Snaps

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mariella View Post
    OK I think I have at least vaguely in my head what it is about you that makes me think ILE > SLE, and it's less about Se than Ne. Is that really a weak and unvalued thing for you? Can you talk some about Ne?
    Now, thinking of Ne as a role function... I try to think about possibilities, but I've been told before that I'm not very creative...

    ... Just spent like 5 minutes trying to find the thread, but no luck. There was a thread on here, like 3 weeks ago? Where someone (I think an ENTp) was combining people's faces with other pictures... I thought it was kind of silly. I do see that as silly Alpha-ness.

    I get upset if I don't have a plan sometimes. It's really weird perhaps, dunno, but I like to think about things, at least sleep on a decision, and make it the next day. But EVEN LITTLE THINGS. Accepting a friend request on facebook even... I want to make sure if it's someone I really want to be friends with... it's kind of weird. I'm paranoid of what my other friends would think, if I become friends with this particular person. So I don't immediately hit 'accept' but just like to think about it.

    I don't like to, so I don't usually answer my cell phone if it's a number I don't recognize. I don't like the awkward, who is this, why are you calling me, how can I help you? I like to think-on-my-feet, but socially, I just like to have a plan on how I'd like to deal with someone. In general I think Beta formalness fits really well. I have no problems calling someone up, if it's specifically clear why I'm calling them, etc. And I have no problem b.s'ing and shooting the breeze, loving to chat, if it's someone I already know, or if that's even the purpose. Just, I don't like it if things are undefined.

    Last example of weak Ne, for now... I have trouble understanding/reconciling different view points... I have a strong drive for perfection, and figuring out what's ultimately right... I've been told before that I view the world as black and white. I think that's devauled Ne...

    I don't like considering other options if it doesn't change the course of action... my sister once, before, didn't like the shirt I was wearing, before we went for Christmas church service... I told her I was planning on changing anyway, so it didn't matter...

    A 2nd time, my same sister (who cares about other people's appearances... I've contemplated ESFj for her) commented in the morning, how my hair looked bad, and she proceeded to talk for like 30 seconds about how it was poking out and everything... I told her I was going to shower... she went on anyway. Saying she didn't like it... I said, 'like I said before, I'm going to shower'.... I don't see the point of her comments, if I'm going to shower anyway. Doesn't change the course of action.

    Just a few examples off the top of my head.

  16. #136
    Creepy-Snaps

    Default

    Glad I could catch up with this thread a bit, when I had some spare time now.

    To do list:
    1) Still read the page/thread from Golden, answer the meta-quadra question.
    2) Listen to more Christopher Reeve videos.
    3) Make more videos of myself.

    Anything else?

    Any other questions/comments for me?

  17. #137
    Creepy-Snaps

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarno View Post
    You share some distinct features with an ESTP-Ti that I know.
    Ah and missed this post too. Just wanted to say thanks again for your opinion.

  18. #138
    not gonna be around as much anymore
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    TIM
    C-IEE
    Posts
    1,255
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hmm, "Meta" Quadra...sounds perfect. Okay, everyone, Mountain Dew now belongs to the Meta Quadra...no wonder he was so difficult to type...
    My life's work (haha):
    http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/blog.php?b=709
    Input, PLEASEAnd thank you

  19. #139
    Creepy-Snaps

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pianosinger View Post
    Hmm, "Meta" Quadra...sounds perfect. Okay, everyone, Mountain Dew now belongs to the Meta Quadra...no wonder he was so difficult to type...
    Does that mean I'm a dual and conflictor with everyone? I have no weaknesses, but likewise no strengths? WHERE DO I BELONG?!

  20. #140
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Dew View Post
    Now, thinking of Ne as a role function... I try to think about possibilities, but I've been told before that I'm not very creative...

    ... Just spent like 5 minutes trying to find the thread, but no luck. There was a thread on here, like 3 weeks ago? Where someone (I think an ENTp) was combining people's faces with other pictures... I thought it was kind of silly. I do see that as silly Alpha-ness.

    I get upset if I don't have a plan sometimes. It's really weird perhaps, dunno, but I like to think about things, at least sleep on a decision, and make it the next day. But EVEN LITTLE THINGS. Accepting a friend request on facebook even... I want to make sure if it's someone I really want to be friends with... it's kind of weird. I'm paranoid of what my other friends would think, if I become friends with this particular person. So I don't immediately hit 'accept' but just like to think about it.

    I don't like to, so I don't usually answer my cell phone if it's a number I don't recognize. I don't like the awkward, who is this, why are you calling me, how can I help you? I like to think-on-my-feet, but socially, I just like to have a plan on how I'd like to deal with someone. In general I think Beta formalness fits really well. I have no problems calling someone up, if it's specifically clear why I'm calling them, etc. And I have no problem b.s'ing and shooting the breeze, loving to chat, if it's someone I already know, or if that's even the purpose. Just, I don't like it if things are undefined.

    Last example of weak Ne, for now... I have trouble understanding/reconciling different view points... I have a strong drive for perfection, and figuring out what's ultimately right... I've been told before that I view the world as black and white. I think that's devauled Ne...

    I don't like considering other options if it doesn't change the course of action... my sister once, before, didn't like the shirt I was wearing, before we went for Christmas church service... I told her I was planning on changing anyway, so it didn't matter...

    A 2nd time, my same sister (who cares about other people's appearances... I've contemplated ESFj for her) commented in the morning, how my hair looked bad, and she proceeded to talk for like 30 seconds about how it was poking out and everything... I told her I was going to shower... she went on anyway. Saying she didn't like it... I said, 'like I said before, I'm going to shower'.... I don't see the point of her comments, if I'm going to shower anyway. Doesn't change the course of action.

    Just a few examples off the top of my head.
    When it comes to doing something on impulse, how do you use Ne?
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  21. #141
    Creepy-Snaps

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    When it comes to doing something on impulse, how do you use Ne?
    Just learned a bit more, that Te can also list lots of examples in explaining reasoning. For this reason (), I do think you could be Te-valuing, and INFj, and that we could, in fact, be conflictors.

    @ question though... Ne really is understanding multiple viewpoints and perspectives... I tend to impulsively act if something is unclear, or become agitated if I don't understand somebody, or perceive a threat. To me, it's less important the understanding, as opposed to what actually is being done and carried out.

    And being highly temperamental, I have risked making bad choices lately... lashing out at people, almost spontaneously quitting my job, or even cutting off my relationship with my gf, even though I still love her deep down, and she loves me... I can make lots of dumb moves without thinking.

    In general, over my entire life, I have been a very upbeat, positive person. These past few months, year even, have been difficult, finding a full-time job after graduation, in this sucky American economy. But I'm going to get a callback tonight, about a job interview for a full-time position tomorrow, or possibly Friday, and I'm very very very very very very happy about that!!!

    And I think ultimately, finally finding a job where I'll have to work hard again, and in possibly something I'll very much enjoy, will allow me to be positive and happy again. And stop taking anger out on other people. I'm believing in myself again. And that's a good thing!

    ... Btw, sorry for:

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    MD. I'm not responding to your posts any longer. Your Se is draining my energy. You have too frequent movements for my rather slow and settled tempo (hence Si valuing). Where the fuck are the Si leading types to give me some pleasantries? I feel like I'm being choked.
    I still find that post funny whenever I read it. Good job speaking up how you feel.

  22. #142
    So fluffeh. Cuddly McFluffles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    TIM
    ESI
    Posts
    2,792
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Dew View Post
    Does that mean I'm a dual and conflictor with everyone? I have no weaknesses, but likewise no strengths? WHERE DO I BELONG?!
    You're Schrödinger's type.
    Johari/Nohari

    "Tell someone you love them today, because life is short; shout it at them in German, because life is also terrifying."

    Fruit, the fluffy kitty.

  23. #143
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North Italy
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,819
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    good lord your smile looks horrible take down that picture plz, barbie's ken could produce a less plastic-looking smile.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  24. #144
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Lol, Fabioless, I should show you pics of my dad. His smile is... distressing.

  25. #145
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    17,948
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    MD. I'm not responding to your posts any longer. No, I'm joking, really. Your Se is lovely. You have too frequent hip movements to the front and your neck is just fantastic, it's so long and shiny I just can't wait to type it. Where the fuck are the Si leading types to give me some pleasantries? I feel like I'm being choked.
    Don't listen to Maritsa, Mountain Dew.

    I have a question and it will help determine your type - do you own a cat or a pony ?

  26. #146
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,478
    Mentioned
    333 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm increasingly convinced that MD is ESE. He always seems to have a positive, upbeat attitude and is far more emotive than I'd expect an SLE to be. Example:

    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Dew View Post
    You're bothered by my smiling and laughing? Wow. You take life too seriously!!!
    The only other possibilities would be some other SF type.

  27. #147
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,478
    Mentioned
    333 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Dew View Post
    Hmm. You seemed to have missed it when I pointed out a few of my weaknesses:





    But that's ok. I appreciate the flattery to my ego, albeit done sarcastically. I'm just so awesome, it doesn't seem like I have many weaknesses, does it? (yuck lol... )

    I think you're awesome too!
    lol, lots of here too.

  28. #148
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Dew View Post
    Just learned a bit more, that Te can also list lots of examples in explaining reasoning. For this reason (), I do think you could be Te-valuing, and INFj, and that we could, in fact, be conflictors.

    @ question though... Ne really is understanding multiple viewpoints and perspectives... I tend to impulsively act if something is unclear, or become agitated if I don't understand somebody, or perceive a threat. To me, it's less important the understanding, as opposed to what actually is being done and carried out.

    And being highly temperamental, I have risked making bad choices lately... lashing out at people, almost spontaneously quitting my job, or even cutting off my relationship with my gf, even though I still love her deep down, and she loves me... I can make lots of dumb moves without thinking.

    In general, over my entire life, I have been a very upbeat, positive person. These past few months, year even, have been difficult, finding a full-time job after graduation, in this sucky American economy. But I'm going to get a callback tonight, about a job interview for a full-time position tomorrow, or possibly Friday, and I'm very very very very very very happy about that!!!

    And I think ultimately, finally finding a job where I'll have to work hard again, and in possibly something I'll very much enjoy, will allow me to be positive and happy again. And stop taking anger out on other people. I'm believing in myself again. And that's a good thing!

    ... Btw, sorry for:



    I still find that post funny whenever I read it. Good job speaking up how you feel.
    That is Ne PoLR. That is all the proof that you will need MD; you're LSI not SLE.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  29. #149
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Another bit of BIG info is notice in your video that when you start talking about your GF and what you do with her, which is Fi stuff, you shut off Ti, analyzing.
    Last edited by Beautiful sky; 03-04-2011 at 02:03 PM.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  30. #150
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,478
    Mentioned
    333 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    I'm increasingly convinced that MD is ESE. He always seems to have a positive, upbeat attitude and is far more emotive than I'd expect an SLE to be.
    Does anybody else agree with me? Just curious.

  31. #151
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    Does anybody else agree with me? Just curious.
    If he were then he wouldn't be as good with analyzing things as he is.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  32. #152
    Creepy-Snaps

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hayley View Post
    Hope that job interview goes well Mountain Dew and that you hear good news very soon.
    Thanks! Went really well, waiting to hear for a callback for a 2nd interview, and about to get a 1st interview at another place too.

    Quote Originally Posted by FDG View Post
    good lord your smile looks horrible take down that picture plz, barbie's ken could produce a less plastic-looking smile.
    Don't tell me what to do. If you don't like me, that's your problem.

    Quote Originally Posted by Absurd View Post
    Don't listen to Maritsa, Mountain Dew.

    I have a question and it will help determine your type - do you own a cat or a pony ?
    I don't see how such an obscure question can really give insight to my type. Not sure if you're just joking or not.

    No pony. Had a couple cats growing up, and loved them. Still have 2 dogs now, and love them too. Who doesn't love their animals though? I think all types can love their pets.

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    I'm increasingly convinced that MD is ESE. He always seems to have a positive, upbeat attitude and is far more emotive than I'd expect an SLE to be. Example:



    The only other possibilities would be some other SF type.
    I'm realizing lately I try way too hard to cheer people up, and that I think I'm bad at it. Better if I just listen. I actually do take life very seriously myself.

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    lol, lots of here too.
    Both Beta and Alpha value Fe.

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    That is Ne PoLR. That is all the proof that you will need MD; you're LSI not SLE.
    Maybe it is how I described it. I still think Ne role fits overall better for me, though.

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    Another bit of BIG info is notice in your video that when you start talking about your GF and what you do with her you shut off Ti, analyzing.
    ? Well uh, yeah? Who analyzes their girlfriends? 'OMG HE STOPPED ANALYZING, HE MUST BE TI-LEADING!' ... seriously? Is that the point you're trying to make?



    And to someone who I think deleted their post, forget the name... the person who thinks they're ESFp...

    Yes, I do feel pressure from my parents to succeed. But a large part of that is basically pressure I've put on myself. I work very hard to reach my goals and accomplish what I set out for.

  33. #153
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,478
    Mentioned
    333 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Dew View Post
    I'm realizing lately I try way too hard to cheer people up, and that I think I'm bad at it. Better if I just listen. I actually do take life very seriously myself.
    That alone is good evidence. Perhaps you think you are bad at it, but ask your friends and family if they agree.

    Both Beta and Alpha value Fe.
    It's not just that, almost every single one of your posts is full of . I think it's very unusual for a logical type to have some random smilies in their signature, for example.

    Your impulsivity seems just as much a product of emotional intensity as it is lack of . Widely varying and overpowering mood swings are a good indication of ego. I talked about this in the thread on and seriousness.

    The need for constant stimulation and being easily bored is because of having as a primary value and strength, I would say. Irrationals seem to relate to that less.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Dew View Post
    Does that mean I'm a dual and conflictor with everyone? I have no weaknesses, but likewise no strengths? WHERE DO I BELONG?!
    ^ Here's some

  34. #154
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    I believe you and I are not conflictors as you are with Mike and Mariella

    I am a super-ego relation with you

    These are relations of mutual respect between partners. Super-Ego partners may think of each other as a distant and slightly mysterious ideal. They often show interest in each other's manners, behaviour and thought composition. Both partners experience a warm feeling towards each other, but for the outsider, these relations may look cold.

    If Super-Ego partners cannot find common interests, their interaction can become very formal. Partners normally think more about expressing their own point of view than listening to their partner. This expression comes from the confident side of one of the partners reaching the unconfident side of the other partner. The latter tries to defend themselves by projecting their confident points in return. Partners normally show interest and respect to each other if they do not know each other well enough. When partners start more close interaction, they start experiencing many problems.

    Super-Ego partners may think that they understand each other well. However, when it comes to day to day matters or co-operative activity, partners start thinking that their partner is deliberately trying to do everything wrong. Super-Ego partners are not interested and do not make each other aware of their intentions. Therefore their actions may look exactly opposite to what was expected. Although the hope and the feeling between partners may remain as before, it does not prevent the conflicts penetrating their relationship.

    When both partners are extroverts, one of them usually feels more unsatisfied with their position. The explanation for this is that they believe that the other partner does not pay as much attention to them as they should and are too occupied with their own matters. Between two introvert partners, one is always thinks about the other as being too obtrusive and clingy. In any case, friction usually begins when partners shift to a more close relationship.

    The above portion is what you and I are doing currently. Expressing our own opinion but not listening to the other.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  35. #155
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,478
    Mentioned
    333 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Dew View Post
    ok, observations on your video:

    -You're a pretty chill person in general, but you can be uncompromising when it comes to certain basic values or expectations of people.
    -You like to stay busy. This is a huge thing with ESEs.
    -You are comfortable interacting with and commenting on your physical environment. In fact this is just about the first thing you say on the video, unprompted!
    -You give a lot of thought to people and your relationships with them. You have a streak of self-sacrifice.
    -You make no mention of socionic categories whatsoever.

  36. #156
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    ok, observations on your video:

    -You're a pretty chill person in general, but you can be uncompromising when it comes to certain basic values or expectations of people.
    -You like to stay busy. This is a huge thing with ESEs.
    -You are comfortable interacting with and commenting on your physical environment. In fact this is just about the first thing you say on the video, unprompted!
    -You give a lot of thought to people and your relationships with them. You have a streak of self-sacrifice.
    Se ego types like to stay busy too; they have a lot of energy to expand, even impulsively; he's stated many times that he is impulsive.
    The last is related to Fi.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  37. #157
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,478
    Mentioned
    333 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    Se ego types like to stay busy too; they have a lot of energy to expand, even impulsively; he's stated many times that he is impulsive.
    The last is related to Fi.
    I don't disagree with either point, but ESEs seem to have more energy than most ego types, in general. In the context of other things MD has said (being motivated by boredom) ESE seems most likely.

  38. #158
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    I don't disagree with either point, but ESEs seem to have more energy than most ego types, in general. In the context of other things MD has said (being motivated by boredom) ESE seems most likely.
    UMM I don't think so; they value Si, pleasure, taking time to relax; that contradicts Se; they demo Se at times, but this demo never overrides ego block functions.

    You haven't seen the clip of Swagger Wagon where the mommy needs rest...she highlights that many times in those commercials...that's very consistent with ESE.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  39. #159
    aka Slacker Slacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    North Korea
    TIM
    IEE
    Posts
    8,814
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ESEs value Si, and enjoy relaxing and what-not, but they also have an Ej temperament and do like to keep busy as well. It's like the are careful to schedule in rest time or something, but they keep themselves scheduled. If he is Beta ST, which I can see, I'd say Ep temperament before Ij temperament. Or I can see ESE too. I am neutral as far as that goes.
    It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.
    -Mark Twain


    You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.

  40. #160
    Creepy-Snaps

    Default

    I think both thehotelambush and Maritsa are still wrong.

    True fact: thehotelambush must generally like my posts and enthusiasm, which is why he's motivated to type me as his dual. Trouble is, your "supervisor" is quite often one of the types to make that mistake for. See the thread on SLE-ESI relations... I have dated an ESI a couple years ago, and fell for that mistake myself. I'm still flattered you generally like my posts though, thanks.

    True fact #2: Maritsa33 is having trouble reconciling typing me as her conflictor, because I was nice to her before. So she became motivated to develop this alternative 'super-ego' theory instead.

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •