There really isn't anything Te about reinventing a complex classification system formed from your own logical assertions that can't be measured against tangible material...Originally Posted by labcoat
Te absorbs information, storing it, it doesn't take that data and structure it to be internally consistent, that's Ti. Both can be used to accomplish something practical and useful, than again practically can be subjective
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
There's nothing complex about reinin dichotomies. Solving a 2nd order system of pdes is complex. Reinin dichotomies are simple descriptions, their only complex facet is observational (i.e. isolating traits which pertain to a single dichotomy, eliminating any other influence).
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Did you not hear that he made something practical and useful? How Te is that? What is wrong with you? Don't you tire yourself of accusing him of not being Te? Having things accurate, structured, practical, useful is all about Judging types, and most importantly of Te.
@Minde
How long did that take you guys?
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I don't remember exactly. At least a couple of months, though. Less than a year. Somewhere in there.
Oh, to find you in dreams - mixing prior, analog, and never-beens... facts slip and turn and change with little lucidity. except the strong, permeating reality of emotion.
I agree with Marie - Smilingeyes's model is simply an effort at squaring the circle - and a suspect circle at that. I've never been able to see the practicality of it - it just seems to be joining the dots to their logical conclusion without actually achieving anything except some mental satisfaction.
No, it's mostly just volume. Find me one Ti type that creates lists of descriptive material as extensive has his. Only 5% of his time was ever spent on creating a system out of these dichotomies. The rest of it was making the descriptions fit. The reason why his system turned out to be bogus is exactly that he didn't give the Ti part it's proper dues.
huitzilopochtli
Real life example? Chris Langan http://www.iscid.org/papers/Langan_CTMU_092902.pdf
Only 5% of his time was ever spent on creating a system out of these dichotomies. The rest of it was making the descriptions fit. The reason why his system turned out to be bogus is exactly that he didn't give the Ti part it's proper dues.
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
Speaking of Smilex, I think I have his identical for my Data Structures class.
Here's a pic.
Last edited by Park; 10-31-2010 at 05:10 AM.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Not a Ti type. Probably INTp...
He changes his type frequently, pehaps he's not Ti.I think he's ESFpReal life example? Chris Langan http://www.iscid.org/papers/Langan_CTMU_092902.pdf
You'll notice that smilingeyes suggests using a "transactional analysis" like approach to socionics in that thread, interpreting what a person is doing in terms of socionics functions rather than in terms of what the person is. This is exactly what the difference between Static (Ti) and Dynamic (Te) functions amounts to.This isn't overtly complex? Easy-to-use behaviour tracker - resurrected (with edits)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote