Originally Posted by
Wyrd
It's not wrong in principle though, which is what you seem to be claiming. If you define that Ij types are not externally orderly in MBTI, then anyone who is externally orderly is not an Ij type in MBTI. MBTI is just a bunch of principles to try to explain what you see. If it makes everyone ESxJ beyond the point where it's not even vaguely useful to type someone as that, that's just proof it's silly, but not that it's internally wrong. That's like asking "What did the bank robbers look like?" "Oh, they all had two legs." That's nearly completely useless, but not wrong.