I disagree. Socionics will certainly be accepted as science in the future. 3 facts:
1.) Types exist, they are not a belief.
The possibility of V.I. is a clear evidence. MBTI researchers even found correlations between types and most other psychological theories.
2.) Intertype relationships are affected by types.
This is not a belief but a fact. Scientific studies will certainly show that.
3.) Jungian dichotomies exist and can be used to define types.
Obvious. 4 most important traits of personality. The genes which determine the dichotomies have just to be found. Society could then say: "Let's have 20% INTj and 20% ESFjs in our population". Gene manipulation...
There is just one little problem concerning socionics: The functions and information elements probably don't really "exist". Model A is just a model to illustrate human behaviour.
The main problem of the people on this forum is that most think functional analysis is the most important point. Don't forget it's just a
model wheras dichotomies and types are
real.