family tree

[silverchris9]

Mom-IEE
Mom's Mom-ESE* (I know, everyone's grandmother is ESE)
Mom's Dad-no idea
Mom's Sister-SEE (possibly SLE, probably SEE)
Her Husband-ESI
Her Daughter-ESE
Her Son-ESI
Mom's Brother 1-Gamma SF*
His Daughter-LSI
Mom's Brother 2-ILE*
Mom's Brother 3-SLI*
Dad-LII
Dad's Dad-IEI*
Dad's Mom-EII*
Dad's Sister 1-Gamma NT
Dad's Sister 2-Something Delta, probably SLI
Stepmom-LSE
Me-IEI
Brother-SEE

I put asterisks next to the ones I'm not as sure of.

EDIT:
Also, I don't think type is really hereditary. I think type is about fundamental psychological choices you make during infancy and maybe even in the womb. You find that certain ways of working with the world are successful/pleasurable and others are unsuccessful/painful. Of course, certain traits that *are* genetically based can influence how successful or unsuccessful certain strategies are. Of course, the obvious opposition to this theory is the fact that parents and children often have conflicting types, so I don't really know...

[crazedrat]

This is going nowhere. Any correlations you find will be erroneous.

[silverchris9]

^Oh, Ni... he's right, of course, but it was a fun exercise to type family members.

[Blaze]

This is going nowhere. Any correlations you find will be erroneous.

yeah really.

socionics is not genetic then. weird. but your type seems to be so "wired in". how do we explain it.

[CheGuevara]

socionics is not genetic then. weird. but your type seems to be so "wired in". how do we explain it.

Reincarnation?

I think that nature makes use of a kind of random generator! In the stone age the groups of Homo Sapiens were very small. If intuitive parents had only intuitive children e.g. it might happen that there are only intuitive people after some generations and the group woul perish. A kind of random generator seems to be necessary.

It is interesting that the type distribution probably worked well in the stone age but is a big problem of today. In the stone age more sensory than intuitive people were required, of course. Today in the information age we would need more intuitive people - but there are still more sensory people. Evolution works slowly...

[Blaze]

Reincarnation?

I think that nature makes use of a kind of random generator! In the stone age the groups of Homo Sapiens were very small. If intuitive parents had only intuitive children e.g. it might happen that there are only intuitive people after some generations and the group woul perish. A kind of random generator seems to be necessary.

It is interesting that the type distribution probably worked well in the stone age but is a big problem of today. In the stone age more sensory than intuitive people were required, of course. Today in the information age we would need more intuitive people - but there are still more sensory people. Evolution works slowly...

you're on to something. random generator. i like that.

i've thought the same thing about sensors...being alot of them in the way back. now we're headed toward the matrix...not sure that's a good thing. where do you think we're headed, then, theoretically?

[The Exception]

Me: LII
Mother: ESE
Dad: SLI
Sister: EII
Sister's Fiancee: IEE?
Her fiancee's brother: LII?

MATERNAL SIDE:

Grandma: LSE
Grandpa: SLI
Aunt: ? SEI (wild guess)
Uncle: SLI
Cousin 1: SLI
Cousin 1's wife: ESE
Cousin 1's children: no idea, they're too young to type
Cousin 2: ESI

PATERNAL SIDE:

Grandma: I dunno. She's hard to type
Grandpa: No idea. He died when I was young
Aunt 1: ESE
Uncle 1: SLE?
Cousin 1: SLI
Cousin 1's wife: SEI
Aunt 2: IEE
Uncle 2: ILE? IEE?
Their children: ESE, SLE, SEI, and 1 unknown
Aunt 3: ?
Uncle 3: LIE
Their son: LII

Alot of SLI's in there.
Not too many gammas