Here's an excellent test. You may use google translator to help you. I approve:
http://www.tests-tests.com/vaisband1.php
Here's an excellent test. You may use google translator to help you. I approve:
http://www.tests-tests.com/vaisband1.php
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I got SLI.
My life's work (haha):
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/blog.php?b=709
Input, PLEASEAnd thank you
OR / Balzac / ILI
First try.
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
GoogleTrans actually doesnt work for me, any new page won't translate. Maybe I need to update something?
I think I've taken this test before though, and probably got INTP or INFP.
Last time I took that test it said LIE.
Yeah shitty test. I got INTp.
this "excellent" test gave me SLI
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/
It gave me SEE
Dumas / SEI
Hmm... well, that's interesting.
I had a lot of trouble with the test since it was in Russian... if it had been in a Romance or Germanic language, that wouldn't have been as alien and I probably could have figured it out without relying totally on the translator.
I got LII in the first try, LSE in the second one.
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
Interesting. Would you guys try to find the last question associated with the type that you want to be and see if it matches the type you think you are?
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I got IEE. Am I the first person to get my actual type?
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
No. I got mine on the first try too. The choice was so easy and so obvious...
The 4th choice was Faith, hope, love, devotion relatives...that's me
The description of my type is one of the best that I've ever found:
Dostoevsky (Ethical-intuitive introvert EII)
Author description - Victor Gulenko
Humanist (Americans "Predictor") believes that the world is ruled by kindness.
These people are inherent in altruism, empathy, kindness, empathy. They tend to be happy happy friends. They - that "vest", which can always cry loved one. Very fond of children, there are some good psychologists, especially children. They are characterized by increased vulnerability and sensitivity, because of what the far psychological distance are indecisive and not demonstrative. Do not like disputes and conflicts. Possess a high degree of insight and discernment. Sometimes these people can be found among teachers - particularly the humanities and literature (they are very poetic, like metaphors, are rich in imagination), but more often they are found among doctors, especially pediatricians, and employees of kindergartens. Gift of a doctor they have by nature, to the same - soft and tolerant people. Can not repel aggression or expansion - in such cases tend to be either suspended or subject. At the same fundamental issues for themselves defending their position until the end. Need to be agile business partner, for which "like a stone wall." Do not look after their comfort, are inattentive to their health. They are very caring in these matters to others. Have the weakest among all psychological types of internal energy, because of what can often get sick. Tend to criticize others for acts of excessive emotionality, themselves often it only on very close psychological distance. Tend to the harmony of human relationships. I am pleased to engage in self-education. Has a talent for literature and psychology. Able to control the great time - until the precise time without a clock. Well able to normalize the work. The scope of professions: Humanities research, culture, literature, psychotherapy (particularly diagnostics), a liberal arts education, literature, journalism.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
My life's work (haha):
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/blog.php?b=709
Input, PLEASEAnd thank you
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
LII.
Told you Snorkle was Alpha.
My life's work (haha):
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/blog.php?b=709
Input, PLEASEAnd thank you
Did you guys have to use google translate on every question? The webpage one went back to Russian after the first question was submitted.
LII or ILE. The first question was most difficult. Neither one quite fit right.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
eh, i can relate to some of it. like the parts about sensitivity/vulnerability and becoming suspended when confronted with aggression stand out for me. but overall i think it sounds like a person who is much nicer, more saintly, and more invested in other peoples' lives than me.
Got to the fourth and final question and realized it was asking me if I wanted to be ILI or IEI. So, I picked IEI.
...yeah, this one was really transparent.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html