Just creating this as an extension of my other "Type Me" post. VI me yall.
Old School:
Just creating this as an extension of my other "Type Me" post. VI me yall.
Old School:
I need a picture taken directly from the side from the shoulder's up; can you manage one?
Yeah, you look like SLI.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Yeah I agree you do VI as ISTp (SLI)
The one you asked for:
And one for fun:
Confirmed SLI. NO. a j type.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 03-22-2012 at 04:42 AM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
His not deducing his type from still photos; I am.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Describe the means by which you're able to determine whether they've competently deduced your info metabolism type from still photos.
AKA: What physical features they use to figure out your type. ASS HOLE.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Effort is necessary to success, but effort isn't equivalent to success. Now explain how you've determined that your mentality has been accurately typed by strangers who viewed a few photos and said nothing more than "you look like...".
They're freely available through the use of the forum search function. Enjoy.
It seems to me that EK is trying to find some legitimacy between VI and personality when all along I've said that the two are complimentary.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Because it isn't very helpful to simply state that someone else is wrong without supplying an alternative.
And I would hide my face in you and you would hide your face in me, and nobody would ever see us any more.
I can see SLI. Are you blood type A?
Your personality is also seen in the pictures, as they include a social context! It is not pure VI.
If his pictures were him playing a pen and paper D&D game, playing a synthesizer (alone) and standing around (alone) in a martial arts costume, then a few photos of him in a large group engaged in causal dining at Applebees (a work related team outing) I would have a totally different type for him. I would say EII!
It is not pure bone structure.
Socionics -
the16types.info
Don't know my blood type.
So you're saying the setting of my pictures gives away my type? Or you're saying that's why it's difficult to VI me?If his pictures were him playing a pen and paper D&D game, playing a synthesizer (alone) and standing around (alone) in a martial arts costume, then a few photos of him in a large group engaged in causal dining at Applebees (a work related team outing) I would have a totally different type for him. I would say EII!
Point out where I said "their" wrong.
Only if you're lazy.
BZZZZZZZZZZT. I'm questioning the utility of VI and cautioning against jumping to hasty conclusions, although you did chat this fellow up in his introductory thread prior to eyeballing his pix. Now since we've cleared up your latest mistaken assumption, be so kind as to provide the standard by which you measure someone's type from photographic evidence.
Do I need to make some VI quotes? Really? Really?
Alright.
Check it out...there's even a stickied thread about this on this very forum.Visual identification, or "VI", as it is commonly called, refers to the process of identifying socionic types based on visual information alone. Depending what method the socionist has developed, this term may refer to any of the following:
diagnosing types based on photographs or their appearance and movements in video
diagnosing types based on people's appearance and movements in real life
using the above as part of the type diagnosis process, but not exclusively
Most often, among enthusiasts, to VI someone means making a guess about a type based on photographs.
Not to mention I already got typed via text explanations earlier.This method is known as "Visual Identification." Videos are highly preferable, but if you choose to post pictures (and you certainly don't have to), I strongly recommend that you
1) post multiple pictures, if possible, and
2) post more than just pictures (i.e. description)
Personally, for visual identification I prefer to have dozens of pictures (or better, someone's whole facebook account), but this is a forum, and there are issues with privacy and space. If you follow these guidelines, the typings you get will be more accurate.
Who are you to tell me what I can and can't do anyways? Give me a break.
I am fucking with you over the blood type...
A picture says a thousand words. Of course socionic type can be guessed better with dynamic input. Your face alone says very little, except maybe that you are judicous...
Socionics -
the16types.info
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Fe vulnerablity triggered his mobilizing Fi to produce a solution to the problem. He expresses dislike (Fi) to balance his uneasyness with the negative feelings he was getting from Korpsey.
Socionics -
the16types.info
Look into enneagram 6, my sensitive & projecting pal, especially the counter-phobic subtype. E-6 is generally a good fit with SLI, which, though indefinite, seemed a safe bet from your self-description in the other thread.
Note to MrRTR, the other freshly-birthed SLI: put your pride aside and give phobic 6 a closer look. If huffiness on the internet is any indicator, this dude's testicular fortitude leaves yours in the dust.
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
Not really sure where you're getting this, "sensitive/projecting" stuff. I'm a little heated yeah, but I'm far from being pissed off. And whatever "projection" you read, wasn't really, "projection." Most was either sarcasm or just the honest truth, "I'm done with this crap," I say that when I can't get a garbage bag wrapped around the rim of the can.
My issue is that you refused to listen to reason and eventually degraded to pointing out a spelling error, which in my book is basically you saying, "I can't win this debate, so I'm going to ignore the facts and just nitpick". It's just a waste of time. I'm not personally offended and don't feel personally attacked in the least bit. It's just annoying when I make a clear point and it's ignored.
As far as type 6 goes, that's a no go. I've studied the Enneagram for well over a year now and type 5 is pretty much a fit.
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor