This is not edited.
‪Maritsa for Socionics INFj‬‏ - YouTube
This is not edited.
‪Maritsa for Socionics INFj‬‏ - YouTube
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Nice video Maritsa!
EII >> EIE
p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
trad metalz | (more coming)
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Your overall temperament/energy reminds me of Discojoe, but in a very anti-Beta way, lol. You also strike me as sp/sx, so there's that.
It was a ploy to get Maritsa to pose as an EIE to screw up the intertype relations. There's no way anyone who knows anything about socionics could confuse a supervisor for a benefactor.
IEE Ne Creative Type
Some and role lovin too. () I too...
!!!!!!
Except your energy is very similar to his. Both very understated, staunch, relatively immobile. This is something I'm observing, and something I've observed lots of times in both him and you.
I don't want this to be a point of argument though, at least not for this thread.
Duals are like that. Except he's more focused outwardly and he interacts more with people, tries to bring them out of complacency or distraction (when on camera with him, I've drifted away into my feelings and he's noticed and pulled me right out by calling attention to me). He shares way too much facts with people and is organized in the same method as an LSE and he has the same temperament/mood as an LSE; he never analyzes anything.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Naww ok I see EII now
Get used to it because you're going to need it to find your dual...here's another EII
This is a BIG lesson for you about the facade of written language and how type can be hidden behind words.
Notice that we're both disorganized in the way we go back and forth on something we say and our hand gesticulation/manners.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I know we have our feelings for one another but I have to say I respect your bravery for doing this
I'm still of the strong opinion that you're EIE, but it's not due to any personal reasons
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Eh, yeah, from this video she's clearly introverted. If you want her to be beta, say LSI or IEI.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
LSI-I don't care about analyzing things
IEI-I have no beta values.
I am a SERIOUS TYPE. BOTH OF THE ABOVE ARE MERRY TYPES.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@Maritsa: I can see Fi-INFj. Btw, you seem rather serious in your video.
Have we considered any gamma types? I still see Se, along with her Fi
Type me whatever you like. It's not going to change who I am. You know, growing up, we had a wealthy HS football team who had the means to compete in games, but we were always in a division with schools who didn't have money to maintain a football team; so, to help support sports, because after all you can't play with yourself, the well to do parents donated to the teams of other schools so that their kids could play sports after all. I see our situation in a similar tone now. I see my existence here as homage for your existence as well. Without me you'll be too bored and nothing to compete with; so, I'm accepting it (not in a defeatist and victim like manner, but in a friendly camaraderie manner; we are after all equals - human).
Do you look anything like me?
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 07-21-2011 at 08:13 AM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm not trying to enforce you to identify with my typing of you if it came across that way, but I do feel that you're too emotionally attached to your type and see any disagreement with it as an attack on you when it's not meant to be
I'm not sure if you posted this in response to what type I see you as or not, but if so I don't believe being a humanitarian or having compassion to be exclusive to any typeYou know, growing up, we had a wealthy HS football team who had the means to compete in games, but we were always in a division with schools who didn't have money to maintain a football team; so, to help support sports, because after all you can't play with yourself, the well to do parents donated to the teams of other schools so that their kids could play sports after all. I see our situation in a similar tone now. I see my existence here as homage for your existence as well. Without me you'll be too bored and nothing to compete with; so, I'm accepting it (not in a defeatist and victim like manner, but in a friendly camaraderie manner; we are after all equals - human).
Regardless of type, Socionics and whatever, I'm glade that you do have a desire to help others and be a helpful member of society, I wish more people did
Just saw this.Do you look anything like me?
I don't think we look alike, we appear to have different backgrounds, you're Armenian if I remember?
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
Look at the video. She speaks slowly; the words don't come naturally. And her posture is somewhat rigid. An SEE is by no means rigid. They are interesting to watch and I doubt they need to preplan their wording.
The primary feature I've noticed about ESIs is their sense of humor. They're into sarcasm. Maritsa doesn't seem to like sarcasm one way or the other.
I see now why you thought this was a terrible idea; I was looking at it from my usual optimistic view point and now I can see that people don't have the perceptive abilities to judge accurately. It takes time for the Negativist views to come to my conscious ability and avail themselves at a second look.
@ DA
I did plan what I was going to say. Thanks
I'm not an Se because I'm not concerned about objects or experience of them.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm still basing Se on your posts an not you video btw...but I define it as being assertive and descisive, comfort in high presure situations and around conflict a willingness to put forward your point of view without fear or concessions. (This is my in context definition)
I don't know you never seem to second guess yourself or (not to sound mean) strongly consider other peoples POV. You present yourself in a way in which you've already made your mind up.
Wrong, any type can be that way. Se is Sensory experience, that which comes through the senses and since its a perceiving type, they are concerned with experiencing objects, the object that gives them the most pleasure, such as eating ice cream, for instance, Se is a function that will want to experience it to the highest forms. You really need to learn the functions, unless otherwise you're using this as a tactic to get me to feed them to you.
Why should I second guess myself? I've grown up with my duals all of my life and now I'm with my dual. A lifetime of practice on how to be decisive, even though I'm really not that decisive, as I mentioned in the video and something that Matt, my BF pointed out isn't enough?
I've had my good shot at the rules for not second guessing:
Here's one:
Pick something and stick with it no matter what.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
ESI are negativist types.
I'm not SEE because I'm
A YIELDING type Protect their resources to the point of conflict, and their reaction may be unduly strong. (this thread is good proof of that); I have the inability to fold sometimes. LOL
http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p..._and_obstinate
You need to learn these functions better.
You're a YIELDING type as well and that is why you're not folding in the attempt to try to absolutely secure my type. You're also trying to flush every doubt out of your mind and eliminate all possible factors...ahh, I need sleep; good night everyone.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You've got it backwards
Augusta defined Si as follows:
White (introverted) sensing
An object's internal state we view as the relationship between events that cause each other [!! unclear description]. This element perceives information about how processes are reflected in one's internal state — people's sense of health and sensations that are caused by processes taking place. Interaction in space is essentially the response of one object to another. Objects respond to other objects, creating certain sensations in each other. Such an individual perceives information from without as sensations related to what is happening. For example, the sensation of pain is essentially the reflection in a person's brain of a relationship between his functioning body and a process occurring in some part of the body that impedes this functioning.
and Se:
Black (extraverted) sensing
Perceives information about what might be called objects' "kinetic energy" — for example, information about how organized/mobilized a person is, his physical energy and power, and his ability to make use of his willpower or position and exercise his will in opposition to others'. This perception implies the ability to tell what reserves of "kinetic energy" people have and how useful they can be in getting things done. It defines the individual's ability or inability to exercise his willpower and energy in opposition to the will and energy of other people.
btw reference link- http://socionics.us/works/socion2.shtml#1
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
Jung's definition is in accord with what Maritsa is saying, though, when she speaks about highest form (intensity) of sensory experience. So she doesn't exactly have it backwards, Jung's and Augusta's writing are partially conflicting.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Awww Maritsa. You have such a big caring heart. I was a lot like yourself when I was a kid too. Quiet, shy and didn't like interacting w/others.
Gah, I really can't hear myself try to argue anymore on here like this, with some people. The fact of the matter is, I know / quadra types, and Maritsa is not an / type. Just because she likes to argue and confront on here, and other EIIs have more reserved standards in this regard. Please get your head out of your hole and observe more people before making these retarded claims from now on. Actually experience, not just read and keep to your few limited typing assumptions. Train your right brain more, and wise up to what others more knowledgeable than you have to say.