INFj
INFj
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 05-06-2010 at 05:30 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm sure this is all very impressive, but it strikes me that you've maybe put a bit too much effort into something that's not really particularly important, sorry.
Well, OK, you think you are like Ritella, OK, no probs
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/
What the fuck IS this?
Originally Posted by Maritsa33
?
Maritsa I'm impressed. See also how we bond so well together, there is a strong functional connection. Please accept my Facebook friend request.
IEE-Ne
1) Lincoln was elected in 1860, Kennedy in 1960, 100 years apart
2) Both men were deeply involved in civil rights for African Americans.
3) Both men were assassinated on a Friday, in the presence of
their wives.
4) Each wife had lost a child while living at the White House.
5) Both men were killed by a bullet that entered the head from behind.
6) Lincoln was killed in Ford's Theater. Kennedy met his death while
riding in a Lincoln convertible made by the Ford Motor Company.
7) Both men were succeeded by vice-presidents named Johnson who were
southern Democrats and former senators.
8) Andrew Johnson was born in 1808. Lyndon Johnson was born in 1908,
exactly one hundred years later.
9) The first name of Lincoln's private secretary was John, the last
name of Kennedy's private secretary was Lincoln.
10) John Wilkes Booth was born in 1839 [according to some sources] Lee
Harvey Oswald was born in 1939, one hundred years later.
11) Both assassins were Southerners who held extremist views.
12) Both assassins were murdered before they could be brought to trial.
13) Booth shot Lincoln in a theater and fled to a warehouse. Oswald
shot Kennedy from a warehouse and fled to a theater.
14) LlNCOLN and KENNEDY each has 7 letters.
15) ANDREW JOHNSON and LYNDON JOHNSON each has 13 letters.
16) JOHN WlLKES BOOTH and LEE HARVEY OSWALD each has 15 letters.
17) A Licoln staffer Miss Kennedy told him not to go to the Theater. A Kennedy staffer Miss Lincoln, told him not to go to Dallas.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
wow, that was out of the blue..
Well I'm frustrated. She has use of the popcorn smilie and the word "dense" listed as reasons they have to be identical. And of course her fabulous rapport with me? Whatever.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Great reply, Mariella. One could do the same with Lady Diana Spencer, born in 1710, and Lady Diana Spencer, born in 1961. The similarities are far less obvious, but had the former's grandmother succeeded... Amazing there are coincidences like that, isn't it.
^that one must have more to do with reincarnation
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
The popcorn one is gaining in popularity, it seems.
We need the one of the little yellow guy banging his head against a brick wall.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Do I smell catfight?
But, um, yeah, Maritsa's got a point there.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
Not really.
*sigh* First, I ask permission of the people whose pictures I post. Second, the reason I don't post my picture publicly here is precisely because of people like Maritsa. For example, since my little cousin doesn't post here, she is not personally known to the people here and thus not in danger of being personally attacked. However, since the people here know me they are a lot more likely to try to use my picture against me or to my harm. I've seen it happen with many people here. Like when people took Ryu's picture and messed with it. Or Ezra's picture. It's that personal connection that makes things especially dangerous.
Oh, to find you in dreams - mixing prior, analog, and never-beens... facts slip and turn and change with little lucidity. except the strong, permeating reality of emotion.
Sorry folks, time for a snack.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
I can't have chocolate. :frown:
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Maritsa....
People are seeing the posts that you are 'deleting'
You have a lot of anger in you, why?
Why are you making such a big deal out of Minde?
Banana cream pie
key lime pie
raspberry sorbet
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
I doubt that's the real answer.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
And, if you do have a problem with my typing, address me, and not her.