...
...
Last edited by Rubicon; 05-01-2010 at 06:45 PM. Reason: How are you today?
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
Aw c'mon. Stabs in the dark? Impressions?
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
This is a stab in the dark but I'm going to say a base type. I get the impression the person becomes one with the instrument when playing, which reminds me of some SLI/SEI musicians I know.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
valuing, I think. Just from reading the first bit, the person seems to focus on classification and "what counts as X".
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
Interesting..
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
Removed at User Request
Yeah. Thanks for the analysis! Makes sense.. The stuff you attributed to Se/Ni - yeah, I didn't relate to that. And I'd say something like "well pianists are just pushing buttons you know? It's not our fault that sounds come out." :-P But it seems that he'd rather keep certain things on a pedestal. I don't relate to that at all. To a certain extent, I relate to the part about music flowing in, and the limbs just moving of their own accord.. but eh - well actually I think I feel more aware of why and where my limbs are moving/going. And the part about not concerning himself with details - I'm always concerning myself with the details. My goal is to be aware of every single detail. :-p
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
ESFj
The person is looking for someone to put a system to their thoughts; they ask "I've been thinking about 'musicianship' and what classifies one as a musician."
They are seeking Ti who classify things, and puts things into a system.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Removed at User Request
Wait, we're allowed to type people based on their monologues?
I would say F > T, in general.
I kinda relate to the part about doing things (and not mechanically) yet not being there completely - I don't play music but I feel like that sometimes, for example when doing presentations. So I suppose Beta NF sounds about right.
Removed at User Request