My impression of
leading is that uncertainty in the form of "maybe it's this, maybe it's that, we have to wait because there's always that other possibilty," etc. drives them nuts.
just wants to go, go, go and does not want to be held up by all of these other considerations that bog it down keeping it from pursuing its objectives.
leading very much wants the "one option" so it can just go with it.
Depending on the context of course, I think that sometimes
leading would argue that there isn't a one, single, option... as it sees so many possible options.
leading that goes with its "one way" can really irritate
as
is well aware of several alternatives that
leading probably hasn't even considered.
wants to be free to keep options open and go with other possibilities and does not want to be subjugated to "one way" of doing something, or "one path."
Synthesizing many fields of study into one is something
is interested in, imo. But what Augusta did was craft a new theory from this synthesis, and that's a product of
as well as of
. Wanting to tie all of these theories floating around into something consistent, and into a sound theory seems more of a
thing to me.