.
.
Last edited by sarinana; 01-28-2010 at 04:17 PM.
I think ISTp
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
At first glance I thought, "He's weird. ENTP." But... on second glance, I think he's a Native American. He's at home in nature... that does seem ISTp; it may just be background, but the calming air isn't.
I'm going with ISTp.
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
funny fact...i made a thread on him based not on VI. People typed him EII.
Should I copy some information from that thread here?
Yeah I tried to figure out what he meant by emotions...but couldnt....
Also the last time we discussed his type he was like..."well I am sure I am an introvert. I am not sure about socionics type... but I fit the description of autistic person very well. "
mhm does it helps typing him if i tell you that he has ZERO reaction to pushiness or manipulation?
he said that feelings only make people unhappy.
Overall, I'm still leaning toward SLI. He seems really natural and relaxed in the way he holds himself. He seems to be nature oriented and kind of artsy in a light way which makes me think delta. There is absolutely no hint of Fe despite his enjoyable atmosphere.
I would say EII but he seems far to natural while EII tends to be awkward and clumsy.
And he seems too in touch with his surroundings to be ILI.
lol kinda ironic don't you think?he said that feelings only make people unhappy.
I find that supervisees are really easy to get along with at least from the supervisor perspective. If the SxE is SEE then illusionaries get on pretty well. Contraries can get along well, but don't mesh well when with others. Super-ego relations are ok as long as they don't get too close.
I find that people only have obvious problems with those that would put down their HA. So, an Fi-unfriendly environment.
Ne-IEE.
Certainty: 99%
I have a good friend who could be his twin. Not only because of the pictures but also because he is weird.
His self-typing is ILI? That fits. Ne-IEEs normaly refuse to categorize anything and they are pretty bad at it.
They don't accept the fact that is their vulnerable function because their decisions seem logical to them.
I'd call them one of my favourite types. No other type is more fun to be with
Last edited by CheGuevara; 11-15-2009 at 02:08 AM.
Ni-INTj --- Harmonizing Analyst --- -
DCNH rox
no the problem is that he doesn't accept the fact that he is bad at understanding others at Fi/Fe level.
After he told me this...I started checking him on this. He just hears and believes what you say.
If you tell him your happy with a fake smile on your face even tho your day is ruined like never before...he will believe you.
Are you sure about that? Do you know him well? Be careful, Ne-IEEs are joking 90% of the time
Could you offer some more information about him? Occupation, hobbies and so on?
Ni-INTj --- Harmonizing Analyst --- -
DCNH rox
Are you aware of the fact that I said -IEE? The other three subtypes in the DCNH system are not that weird, of course...
Maybe you know some -IEEs or -IEEs. They would never play games with you and rather wouldn't touch alligators.
(Victor Gulenko) A very sociable, spirited, mobile person. The initiator of many things; however, They are characterized by great restlessness and changeability. Very creative, but scattered and undisciplined. Capable of letting others know of his dissatisfaction, also, shows disrespect towards authorities. Outwardly, they frequently have complete rounded forms. In their clothing they can be demonstrative and bright, sometimes even loud.
Ni-INTj --- Harmonizing Analyst --- -
DCNH rox
Assuming that subtype really even makes that much of difference do you really think the bold applies?
The DCNH system isn't very well developed, and those descriptions weren't even meant for it anyway. The fact is that no one really understands DCNH well, and I haven't seen anything from you that shows you even understand basic socionics.
give me a real reason why you think IEE, and then I'll take your typing seriously.
Ni-INTj --- Harmonizing Analyst --- -
DCNH rox
Didn't I state the fact that a good friend of mine looks like his twin? I'm sure about my friend's type, I'm convinced I have very good V.I. skills so I'm just 99% sure about this guy's type. It's not the only Ne-IEE I know, of course.
Delta NF isn't a bad guess but I don't know any weird EII.funny fact...i made a thread on him based not on VI. People typed him EII.
That's what people with weak have.He has a tendency to self-contradiction...
Ni-INTj --- Harmonizing Analyst --- -
DCNH rox
Can you be more specific? Even biological twins have different types.
Ne egos in general tend to be somewhat clumsy. Good point about Ti, but undervalued Ti can be the same. Strong+undervalued Ti sometimes purposefully.Delta NF isn't a bad guess but I don't know any weird EII.
That's what people with weak have.
Some mutations may occur and the environment may cause different habits but I don't think that changes the type.
We're offtopic btw...
V.I. works for me because
- I learned the basics with my base function
- I can decide if someone is likable or not with my role function
- I can compare him to people I know with my demonstrative function
- I can state the possibility of a correct typing with my creative function
Ni-INTj --- Harmonizing Analyst --- -
DCNH rox
That's not how my Visual Identification works. I could say the eyes are similar, che chin is similar and so on but that doesn't help much. It's rather the overall appearance...
Sergei Ganin says: "In the same way people can tell women from men by their looks, it is also possible to distinguish between the Psychological Types of people."
Or here he says: "V.I. is very intuitive method of Type identification. Imagine the equation with hundreds of variables. When everything falls into place - you just know. When something is not quite right - you just know. There is no way to explain this feeling, you have to experience it to understand."
I know that Ganin is not seen as a good Socionist on this forum
Ni-INTj --- Harmonizing Analyst --- -
DCNH rox
Nobody's bashing V.I. here, but this doesn't say anything about how the types specifically distinguish themselves from any other types. All it says is that it has validity (albeit without a very convincing rhetorical scheme).
This makes no guarantees as to whether or not one's personal V.I. skills are accurate or not.
Were you to post pictures of said friend who closely resembles the man in question, then we'd probably have something to discuss.
You're learning.