Votevotevote.
CONCLUSIVE Te DATA GATHERING FOR MAXIMAL OPTIMUM TRUTHFUL.
EDIT
Could someone with the POWAH to do so add "Alpha: No, neither" and "Non-Alpha: No, neither"?
Votevotevote.
CONCLUSIVE Te DATA GATHERING FOR MAXIMAL OPTIMUM TRUTHFUL.
EDIT
Could someone with the POWAH to do so add "Alpha: No, neither" and "Non-Alpha: No, neither"?
Those options are already covered aren't they?
um...options need to be tweaked
yes epher, no hkkmr
and
no epher, yes hkkmr
need to be in there, or allow multiple choice
ILE-Ti
6w7 sx/sp (low level of confidence)
Hang on, is the bit before the colon the quadra of the person being asked? Or the quadra you think they are in?
ILE-Ti
6w7 sx/sp (low level of confidence)
wat
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
Lots of cases on the forum are borderline, but the only person I can say without a shred of doubt is not Alpha is niffweed17.
Zero Ti valuing.
Zero Ne valuing.
Zero Si valuing.
Zero Fe valuing.
In my entire life, out of every single person I've ever met, he's the only one that manages to contradict almost every aspect of Alpha in some way. I'm even sure this is a compliment to him.
hoodrat is more likely than niffweed to be Alpha.
Nah. Once you understand a definition of something to be "does not like emotions" or some shit, its pretty effing easy to go around being a overly critical jerk, as if you don't like emotional expression. Its apparent online, but having met Niffweed irl, I can say with even greater confidence that he is an IJ temperament infantile, and when him and I had an interesting conversation away from the group the entire discussion was framed in Ti dissection and categorization.
Even then, most of you fail to realize that Fe has nothing to do with what Niff thinks it does, and neither does the Ni/Se dichotomy. If you ask the Alpha NT's here I'm sure most if not all will also dislike things normally attributed to Fe like being a loud manipulative cry baby and an ethical sell-out.
He exudes no Se, and I'm quite positive he would neither enjoy an ESFp (like Hoodrat) nor would his quirky random dry humor and overtly critical nature elate an ESFp. In fact, they would likely grow tired of him quickly and find his antics obnoxious. I certainly do not, because he's a lovable zany Alpha NT, who is just being a spiteful 5w6 mad at the world for its various misdeeds and now hes walled himself up behind a mountain of "objectivity" and "facts" for fear of letting go and putting himself out there. Its pretty freakin obvious.
Not that I dislike Niff personally nor do I think he's a moron, but I feel he has stuck himself into a false persona based on other psychological factors that have absolutely nothing to do with gamma or socionics.
Zero Ni valuing
Zero Te valuing
Zero Fi valuing
Zero Se valuing (the most apparent one)
Niffweed is as Alpha as it gets, and one day, you'll understand that.
/threadjack counter-attack
The end is nigh
Archon, I was trying before to give your understanding the maximum benefit of the doubt, but you just lost my respect with this one post. You have absolutely no right to assume anything about which dogma or beliefs about socionics I'm bringing into a discussion before you hear them. Much of your argument is a strawman fallacy as a result.
I never said Fe-polr had anything to do with disliking emotions. Ever. The rest of what you wrote w/ regards to that is correspondingly false. I haven't met him so I can't comment on his temperament. But even if he were IJ, I'd sooner consider ESI for him than LII.
I dislike most things attributed to Fe, so I know this. You're not telling me anything I'm not already aware of. Nowhere was this ever a criterion for my typing or any typing I've ever constructed for anybody.Even then, most of you fail to realize that Fe has nothing to do with what Niff thinks it does, and neither does the Ni/Se dichotomy. If you ask the Alpha NT's here I'm sure most if not all will also dislike things normally attributed to Fe like being a loud manipulative cry baby and an ethical sell-out.
No it's no pretty freakin obvious. Why the hell would you think an Se superid is strong in Se? Please give me a logical justification before I take you seriously. Model A and Jung's justifications are pretty straightforward as to why Se wouldn't be very strong in an Ni ego, but please do provide your reasoning.He exudes no Se, and I'm quite positive he would neither enjoy an ESFp (like Hoodrat) nor would his quirky random dry humor and overtly critical nature elate an ESFp. In fact, they would likely grow tired of him quickly and find his antics obnoxious. I certainly do not, because he's a lovable zany Alpha NT, who is just being a spiteful 5w6 mad at the world for its various misdeeds and now hes walled himself up behind a mountain of "objectivity" and "facts" for fear of letting go and putting himself out there. Its pretty freakin obvious.
cpig doesn't exude very much Se either, and neither does dolphin fwiw.
Additionally, I find your entire method of basing a typing entirely on niffweed's unhealthy characteristics demonstrative of a belittling attitude towards both niffweed and LIIs that you probably picked up elsewhere, and not likely to lead to any good and objective typing.
He exudes absolutely no Ti. Virtually no Ne. He exudes Te, Ni and possibly unhealthy levels of Fi.Not that I dislike Niff personally nor do I think he's a moron, but I feel he has stuck himself into a false persona based on other psychological factors that have absolutely nothing to do with gamma or socionics.
Zero Ni valuing
Zero Te valuing
Zero Fi valuing
Zero Se valuing (the most apparent one)
Niffweed is as Alpha as it gets, and one day, you'll understand that.
/threadjack counter-attack
But yeah, he's gotta be Ti ego because he creates rigid constructs about things and doesn't vary his system of objective facts.
No.
Sharign isn't caring </3
You never cared about me!
You are not the only one who thinks him to be ILI. Your post was preaching to the choir and I wasn't going to let my opinions go unsaid. I never specified YOU (as in Jrxtes) and my post was addressed to anyone who cares.
Once again, did not specify you, I was addressing things which are in fact quite commonly cited as the behavior of Fe-ers.
And how the fuck is Niffweed anything like any ISFj's here?
Yup, was making an opening argument for Niff's type, not specifically arguing against what you said, partly because you did not give an argument.
Ni is complementary to Se. I am of the opinion that you do in fact use Se as an Ni vauler. This "strong" "weak" dichotomy is misleading. I want you to look at the posts of Strrrng, bulletsanddoves, crazedrat, and Capitalistpig. Also look at FDG's and Ashton's posts (on socionix) or how they speak/type in stickam or w/e.
There is a very very very very very very very very very obvious difference.
Depends on your definition of Se first off, and from mine, they do.
I am not belittling him. I am pointing out what I see. If I'm not allowed to speak freely than wtf do you want me to say? People have issues. I have issues, you probably have some issues, everyone has issues and this will lead to negative circumstances.
How have I belittled LII's? I love LIIs. I want Niff to choose LII because I think it would help him and I like when people are happy =\
There is nothing purposefully mean-spirited about my argument.
Nope, dont see that.
When did I say that? I said that when actually having a conversation with the dude, he spoke just like me, framing everything into nice boxes of Ti and separating information in a way I understood easily. Like, tbh, I felt very excited at the meet, and often it feels like I have to drag my feet through the mud to get anywhere in a discussion with people, but the concepts we spoke of seemed (on my side, at least) to be integrated rapidly.
I'm refusing to bow down to shame and fear of being ostracized for what I see.
The end is nigh
I <3 Carla.
If it wasn't for Simon, I'd marry you.
The end is nigh
Foolish Yake, Carla is a polygigglamist.
Join me carla... together we can rule the forum!
The end is nigh
Carla, I have an idea. Let's start a marriage fraud. I'll be your lawyer, you just have to marry a bunch of people then crush their hearts in a divorce and take have of their belongings. What do you think?
ILE
7w8 so/sp
Very busy with work. Only kind of around.
idk I'm bored.
I mean I can either program lego bots or martyr myself upon the 16types massive cock.
I went with the latter, but my bot's program is all silly-like, so perhaps ill change me mind.
The end is nigh
Funny you say that, because this comment seemed directed at me...
Niffweed is as Alpha as it gets, and one day, you'll understand that.
But if the rest of your post was directed at "commonly cited arguments," very well then.
He isn't, which is the point, because it's still more likely than LII if he has IJ temperament.And how the fuck is Niffweed anything like any ISFj's here?
Prove why the dichotomy is misleading. You're contradicting many people's observations, so please provide some validation of your assertion. Give me some proof why I should listen to you over theirs and my own observations.Ni is complementary to Se. I am of the opinion that you do in fact use Se as an Ni vauler. This "strong" "weak" dichotomy is misleading. I want you to look at the posts of Strrrng, bulletsanddoves, crazedrat, and Capitalistpig. Also look at FDG's and Ashton's posts (on socionix) or how they speak/type in stickam or w/e.
I don't believe any of the aforementioned people have strong Se. strrrng and crazedrat acted like assholes, but that doesn't make them strong in Se. B&D writes posts to shock people but that doesn't make him very strong in Se either. Why do you believe they have strong Se?
Ashton may certainly be Se ego or has a strong Se agenda. I haven't read enough of FDG's material to say anything about him.
I think cpig and niff have a lot in common actually. I even thought their intonation was kind of similar, if that means anything.There is a very very very very very very very very very obvious difference.
My definition of Se is both conceptual (I could go into some detail if you want) and social/behavioral, and I believe niffweed very much satisfies both criteria.Depends on your definition of Se first off, and from mine, they do.
You're typing someone based on some alleged fucking neuroses, and you don't think that's offensive!!? You're making presumptions about his type based largely on your impression of his negative traits. Although it's true you're typing him based on a connection you made, but the rest of your argument is about how Ti manifests in him as "hiding behind a wall of objectivity" -- this is not healthy behaviour for any type and shouldn't be a criterion.I am not belittling him. I am pointing out what I see. If I'm not allowed to speak freely than wtf do you want me to say? People have issues. I have issues, you probably have some issues, everyone has issues and this will lead to negative circumstances.
How have I belittled LII's? I love LIIs. I want Niff to choose LII because I think it would help him and I like when people are happy =\
There is nothing purposefully mean-spirited about my argument.
Having good intentions means nothing if you don't bring objective facts to bear.
Ever considered that you're both Ni ego, and that related types process information into "neat little boxes" for each others' comprehension?When did I say that? I said that when actually having a conversation with the dude, he spoke just like me, framing everything into nice boxes of Ti and separating information in a way I understood easily. Like, tbh, I felt very excited at the meet, and often it feels like I have to drag my feet through the mud to get anywhere in a discussion with people, but the concepts we spoke of seemed (on my side, at least) to be integrated rapidly.
awat
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
That.
Was.
AWESOME
ILE
7w8 so/sp
Very busy with work. Only kind of around.
It said that I needed one character !
So I gave it what it asked for !
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
Quotamid.
But I digress.
I DON'T WANNA DIE.
WHY DID I HAVE TO BE A TEREGSLAVE?
niffweed17 as ISFj > INTj is probably the dumbest thing I've seen posted in a while.
Do you not read myposts, then, DeAnte?
W/e to everything else, but when I called attention to the the various male Ni egos, I was pointing to both the Ni and Se manifestation in their speech and behavior.
We are at a disagreement here Jrxtes about something in particular, which I've argued (slightly) with you before. The difference is that I believe a person expresses all their valued elements behaviorally (in differing quantities and qualities).
I use to think it was more like this:
valued - strong
unvalued - weak
However I came up with something that makes more sense (to me, at least)
Ego - strong
Id - primitive
Super Id - primitive
Superego - weak
But yeah...uhhh...
oh.
I've been down the whole "Archon's Ni" deal before. No. I'm really not.
Actually I'm curious about why people think this... I'll make a thread.
The end is nigh
I haven't read half the posts in this thread.
As little interest as I have in niffweed17's type, Se-PoLR makes a million times more sense than Se ego or DS as well as INTj/IJ > ISFj/INTp, which is based on weird ass humor and videos alone.
edit: @ Archon, I don't care for the "strong/weak" language either.
I believe this too, so that can't be the difference. It's more likely that we're working with different definitions of the elements, plus typing someone is always a pretty subjective process.
Actually that's getting surprisingly closer to how I understand it. The valued=strong, unvalued=weak thing always seemed like a neat copout to me. I'd add that that id= strong/primitive, and it'd be fairly consistent with lots of my own understanding.I use to think it was more like this:
valued - strong
unvalued - weak
However I came up with something that makes more sense (to me, at least)
Ego - strong
Id - primitive
Super Id - primitive
Superego - weak
Are we making progress back to your original beliefs about socionics?
Fair enough if that's your final verdict on his type, but in my mind he'll always be my contrary.Originally Posted by DeAnte
well idk if I'm going back to my "original beliefs", but perhaps we are finding common ground.
Yeah, maybe we do have different elemental descriptions, but in the Ne/Si thread it basically came down to where we were agreeing with eachother.
Its probably a disagreement of what the elements look like when behaviorally expressed.
The end is nigh
That's true, we were. Except for your analogy which you reneged, we probably do define the elements fairly (but not perfectly) close enough.
Bingo! This is it. That's why I get annoyed when people downplay studying the behavioral aspects of socionics. Unless you can look inside someone's mind directly, behavior is the only way to type someone.Its probably a disagreement of what the elements look like when behaviorally expressed.
Yep totally agree, but you have to make sure your connecting the right behaviors to the right elements, and that's our falling out.
Maybe we can come to agreement in the future.
The end is nigh
What IIIIII don't understand is whyyyyyyyy people (like you DeAnte, just to point fingers, because someone has to be accused, so you're it, but it's okay, I can imply accusation against Archon as well, in a subtle way where you feel like I'm referring to you, but you're not sure, because this makes it more back-stabbing like in nature) seem to conclude that everyone else's typings are based off of all of these assumptions that they have pulled out of other people's heads (because they are telepathic, of course) and then counter these assumptions to point out the true typings of people as if it is what everyone else thinks.
Case in point:Is it now?Originally Posted by DeAnte
It would almost make more sense to create a User Assumptions Accusations List on Wikisocion or something where you list each user/poster and what you feel are their misguided assumptions. Oh, the wars everyone would fight on the discussion page. Sigh.
I'm just pointing out a missed opportunity.
My point is... 1. If you're going to be the thought police, do it right. 2. Be very careful before you go assuming things about what others are or are not assuming? Before trying to attribute a whole bunch of things to their motivations. Yes there is some transparency, but interpretations are falliable.
OH, and also 3. It's insulting. Why would "everyone" think that someone was a type based on something like a weird sense of humor alone? Is everyone an idiot but you? No one is able to think about things further than that? Really? How interesting.
I find it somewhat unnerving that over 80% of voters are subT.
Umm....what?
Are you suggesting that I'm suggesting that nearly everyone on the forum is mistyped? I am not. Though there are quite a few people on the forum who are mistyped IMO.
I also don't make assumptions that everyone agrees with me.
I'm not sure if you're asking me why I would type someone based on a "weird sense of humor alone" or why I disagree with typings which others here agree with. Maybe both.
Anyways, I disagree with others because we have different ideas on how information elements manifest, etc.
Reading your posts makes me want to shit on your keyboard. And yes, most people are idiots. Especially if they think ISFj is a more reasonable typing for niffweed17 than INTj.