*edit*
*edit*
Last edited by Joy; 04-24-2008 at 10:49 AM.
Limited time only, btw.
Alpha NT
*edit*
Last edited by Joy; 04-24-2008 at 10:55 AM.
huh i saw Fe first.
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
INTj is a serious possibility, actually. But I wouldn't rule out every other type yet.
LIE is quite unlikely.
I was thinking LSI > SLE > ILE > LII.
something says Fe.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
It's unlikely that he's got a Se PoLR.
Beta popped into my head, he seems to be comfortable with , at least.
I'm thinking ISTj.
D-SEI 9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
Quadra belongings simply can't be observed on V.I. What you can observe when you try to determine a person's type using the V.I. method is whether the person is more likely an S type or an N type (an aspect that has to do with, among other things, the lower part of your face and your eyes), whether someone is more likely a rational (J) type or an irrational (P) (has to do with roundness, accentuated angles of the face, etc.), and other aspects of the face that are related to the four dichotomies. And you can observe the person's body type, which is also type related to varying degrees in different types. This particular person seems to have a body type that is almost never found in SLEs, for example.
I don't rule out that for certain, but can't you see that his lower part of the face suggest N, at least on the picture where he smiles. In the other picture his face looks more square in that area in a way that is more compatible with ISTj, but it is still not a typical ISTj face. INTj is still more likely based on V.I. We need more information to back up your ISTj thesis, because it can't stand on its own here.Originally Posted by Kamangir
Reminded me immediately of a guy I had typed as either LIE or LSI, with LII as a remote possibility.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Anyways, he's the guy who phaedrus reminds me a lot of.
Interesting. I don't have the same facial structure as your guy, and we don't seem to have the same body type. But apparently you seem to confuse my attitude and behaviour with that of a LII, like for example Sergei Ganin (who has a rather strong resemblance with the guy if we look at the second of the pictures you posted, where he didn't smile). We can be pretty sure that the guy is not an LSI, and it is even less likely that I am an LSI (because the chance of that is approximately zero).
Now, the important question is: How do we learn people to see the difference(s) between LIIs and ILIs, between leading types and creative types? Why is that so difficult? I don't know the answer to that, but it is very obvious that this is a general tendency among certain members of this forum.
It's extremely unlikely that this guy is LII. I've lived with people with Se PoLR's almost my entire life, and he does not have one.
LSI, most likely.
Last edited by Joy; 04-24-2008 at 02:27 PM.
That is, not all LSI's look the same.
I know. But many LSIs have a rather characteristic look that I can spot, if the person happens to have that exact kind of look. This guy doesn't have it, but that doesn't necessarily mean that he can't be an LSI, because he looks like a rational type, especially in the picture where he doesn't smile.