The most characteristic difference is the difference in the work of the EGO block, which, as we remember, consists of basic and creative functions. Of course, in both cases, the main factor is the issue of attitude, and you need to want to work on creative CHI. The whole snag is just that the EII of the intuitive subtype wants this more often than its identity of the ethical subtype, which, in turn, clings more strongly to the invariability of its views. We can say that the ethical Dostoevsky is somewhat more conservative and confident in his judgments, while the intuitive is somewhat more inclined to work on them and, perhaps, even to revise them. This is the main essence of the "activity" and "passivity" of vertical subtypes in the case of EII.
The situation is similar with the SUPERID block, which includes the suggested and activation functions. Although for any Adequate, the organization of the surrounding space is the primary condition for a happy existence, the representative of the basic subtype expects a much more pronounced functional component, and prefers greater simplicity in matters of aesthetics and physical comfort. The intuitive subtype, on the other hand, tends to be more functional laconic, with a slightly greater emphasis on sensory diversity. This moment, in addition, quite bizarrely correlates with Reinin's sign of "declarativeness" in the Dostoevskys, which is especially noticeable in writing: the ethical EII tries to convey its thought in the most detailed way and can roll out "kilometer" treatises, so as not to forget anything important and eliminate all possible misunderstandings and discrepancies; the intuitive EII is more inclined to express his thoughts succinctly, fully, but as briefly as possible, so that the essence, the main message of the monologue is not lost. The ethical subtype is also somewhat more bureaucratic than the intuitive subtype, although it also has such a tendency.
The functions of the SUPEREGO block, role-playing and painful, also have some distinctive features. With role-playing, everything is quite simple: a representative of the ethical subtype in the use of belological abstractions and the language of systems is more daring, confident and in working on the aspect is able to take a blow for a little longer and not go into other, stronger aspects. But the point here is not only and not so much in the role itself: BL is often used by the Dostoevskys as a wrapper around their ethical judgments, since it is such information, in their opinion, that is appreciated by others (of course, this is a delusion). If EII begins to doubt his judgments, he begins to use his creative function. And since in this sense the intuitive subtype is more malleable than the ethical subtype, the following picture is obtained: while the ethical EII often gets tired of using the role-playing and switches to the basic one in its purest form, the intuitive one may begin to doubt the original ethical premise and switches to the creative one (not because the role-playing one is no longer enough, but because the original reason requires revision). With the pain function, everything is somewhat more interesting, the severity of the pain function in the creative subtype does not indicate its lower vulnerability in comparison with the basic pain subtype. Dostoevskys of the intuitive subtype often record the manifestations of emergency situations not only in relation to themselves, but also in the surrounding world in general. On the one hand, this state of affairs noticeably complicates their life (after all, there is always a place for emergency situations in the world around us), but, on the other hand, it allows us to see our own manifestations of the seizure of space and handle them more accurately. and at the same time do not provoke others to respond. EII of the basic subtype in this sense can accidentally try to take over control of the situation or put pressure on someone, which ultimately either will not be successful or will lead to excessive overstrain of a weak function. In addition, Dostas sometimes, in the flow of information directed at them, take for the capture that which is not. In this case, the reaction of the EII of the ethical subtype will be somewhat more violent and vivid.
The functions of the ID block also have their own peculiarities. It would be wrong to say that the restrictive CHE of various subtypes expects a different amount of information, since it is designed to regulate the role function of the dual, the quantitative manifestation of which depends not so much on its subtype as on the so-called socionic maturity. We only note that the basic EII subtype is characterized by stricter observation and criticism of the surrounding emotional background, the accumulation of deeper reserves and, accordingly, a brighter emotional reaction in a critical situation, while Dostoevsky of the creative subtype in this matter is less patient and more likely to "bomb ", even in the case when the situation, in fact, could be dealt with in other ways. Note also, that the need to set the mood drains the Dostoevskys of both subtypes, after which they both need peace. As for the background, in the creative subtype it is as much more active as it is more unconscious: the intuitive Dostoevsky will more strive to do everything faster and in one fell swoop, because then he may not even get down to it at all. This is, on the one hand, a lack of understanding and (this is important!) Striving to understand timeliness, and on the other, sharpening under the dual of the same subtype, which, due to its painfulness, does not accept information on BI in any form at all. The basic subtype in this regard feels the moment a little better, but prefers not to listen to these sensations, which is also a sharpening under the dual, which, without realizing it, can dictate its own rules in this matter.