Interesting. I join to the group of people who sometimes mix up beta rationals. I'm sure I've done this mistake more than once IRL.
I have a mental image of what a LSI woman should be and it's something like Hillary Clinton or Sharon Stone. Both of them display enough Se (and by the way, they have a creative-Se focused gaze). But the less Se-evident LSIs could project a quite
introspective aura to the point of being misunderstood as intuitives, particularly as Ni-EIEs (they still lack the skill for promoting emotional states in others).
Could this be an enneagram thing? Or maybe an instictual stacking, being the "classical" LSIs so[sx]-first, and the "atypical" ones sp-first? (enneagram pundits could contribute here, I have never paid too much attention to stackings).
Here is (imo) another example of these quasi-EIE LSIs: Spanish politician Tania Sanchez from Izquierda Unida (United Left):
tania--644x362.JPG8549532_300x300.jpg
She's passionate and definitely rational, but her argumentations tends to be logic-based (or at least logically articulated, because they're full of questionable ideology). Her ex-boyfriend, by the other hand, is closer to a typical EIE: Pablo Sanchez, the infamous leader of the Spanish radical-left party Podemos (We can), which is full of betas, by the way:
1399569896_077942_1399581512_noticia_normal.jpg1416069106292.jpgEl-lider-de-Podemos-Pablo-Igle_54417260770_54028874188_960_639.jpg
His speeches are commonly oriented to cause strong emotional reactions in people.